期刊文献+

分散固相萃取-液相色谱-串联质谱法测定水果中19种酸性农药 被引量:20

Determination of 19 Acidic Pesticide Residues in Fruit by Dispersive Solid Phase Extraction and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 建立了同时检测葡萄、苹果和桔子等水果中2,4-滴等19种酸性农药的分散固相萃取-液相色谱-串联质谱(HPLC-MS/MS)方法。葡萄、苹果和桔子样品经乙酸-乙腈(1∶99,V/V)提取后,C18分散固相萃取净化,采用反相C18色谱柱分离。以0.1%甲酸和0.1%甲酸-乙腈溶液作为流动相进行梯度洗脱,采用多反应监测离子模式进行定性分析,基质标准曲线外标法进行定量分析,线性范围在0.01~0.2 mg/kg之间。在0.02,0.05和0.1 mg/kg添加水平下,19种酸性农药的回收率为70.3%~105.3%;相对标准偏差为0.37%~10.9%。本方法的定量限为0.005~0.02 mg/kg。 A method was developed for the determination of 19 acidic pesticides in fruit by dispersive solid phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The 19 analytes were extracted from the fruit samples by acetic acid-acetonitrile (1:99, V/V), and purified by dispersion solid phase extraction using C18 sorbent, and then analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The 19 analytes were then separated on a reversed phase column using a gradient elution program of aqueous solution containing 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution and 0.1% formic acid acetonitrile solution. Qualitative analysis was performed using multiple-reaction monitoring (MRM). Matrix-matched calibrations were respectively used to quantify the residue concentrations. The recoveries were in the range of 70.3% -105. 3%, and the relative standard deviation (RSDs) were 0. 4- 10. 9% at 0 02 mg/kg, 0.05 mg/kg and 0.1 mg/kg three spiked levels for all analytes. The limits of quantification (LOQ) for all analytes were between 0.005 mg/kg and 0.02 mg/kg.
出处 《分析化学》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期354-359,共6页 Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry
基金 国家科技支撑计划(No.2009BADB7B04)资助项目
关键词 液相色谱-串联质谱 酸性农药 分散固相萃取 水果 Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry Acidic pesticides Dispersive solid phase extraction Fruit
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1GB 2760-2011, Food Safety Standards for Uses of Food Additives. National Standards of the People's Republic of China.
  • 2CAO Qiu-Feng, Meng Yu-Ping, YOKOTA Kiyoshi, WANG Jin-Ze. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica,2004,19 (2) : 100-103.
  • 3KE Fu-Zhi, XU Jiang-Guo, WENG Fa-Ling, WANG Li-Hong, WANG Yun-Bin. Zhejiang Citrus, 2000, 17(3) : 23-24.
  • 4EPA. Reregistration Eligibility Decision for 2,4-D, http ://www. epa. gov/oppsrrdl/REDs/24d_red, pdf, 2005.
  • 5Zahm S H, Weisenburger D D, Babbitt P A, Saal R C, Vaught J B, Cantor K P, Blair A. Epidemiol, 1990, 1 (5) : 349-356.
  • 6CHEN Zheng-Fu, ZHU Jian, ZHOU Ya-Kang. Analysis and Evaluation of Environmental Hormone. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2004 : 10-13.
  • 7YAN Hong-Fei, HUANG Zhi-Qiang, ZHANG Ying, LI Yong-Jun, WANG Mei-Ling. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2009, 27 ( 3 ) : 288-293.
  • 8GUi Jian-Ye, WEI Fu-Xiang, QI Ji-Xiang, CHEN Zong-Yu, ZHANG Zhao-Ji, ZHANG Li, ZHANG Yong-Tao, LI Xiao- Ya, ZUO Hai-Ying, WANG Hao-Ran. Chinese J. Anal. Chem. , 2011, 39(12) : 1877-1881.
  • 9GUI Jian-Ye, ZHANG Li, LIU Ji-Hua, ZHANG Yong-Tao, ZUO Hai-Ying, LI Xiao-Ya, ZHANG Lin, LI Gui-Xiang. Chinese J. Anal. Chem. , 2011, 38(9) : 1877-1881.
  • 10Shin E H, Choi J H, Abd EI-Aty A M, Khay, Kim S J, lm M H, Kwon C H, Shim J H. Biomed Chromatogr, 2011, 25(1-2) : 124-135.

同被引文献270

引证文献20

二级引证文献231

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部