期刊文献+

比较效益研究的设计、实施和分析方法概述 被引量:4

Overview of design,implementation and analysis of comparative effectiveness research
原文传递
导出
摘要 比较效益研究(comparative effectiveness research,CER)被认为是一种可以提升医疗卫生研究质量的有力工具,该工具从策略层面上有益降低医疗卫生成本。比较效益研究的提出仍然源自于"效力"和"效果"的研究问题。以往的效力研究总是在较为严格的控制条件下探索干预措施是否有效,而现今的医学研究除了探索有效之外,更关注针对谁有效,在哪一种情况下有效的效果问题。过去经典的效力研究常通过比较一种新干预措施和安慰剂,来获得其效力的评价。现今CER发展到对两种或多种不同干预措施进行直接对比,而且强调在尽可能接近临床实际减少人为控制因素的情况下进行对比。该文通过对系列文献和报告的归纳和总结,就如何设计、实施、分析CER,进行了分析和综述,为以后中医药研究者开展类似研究提供参考。 Comparative effectiveness research (CER) has been regarded as a hot topic in health care recently. Many medicalr esearchers currently deem CER as a potential powerful instrument for improving the quality of heahhcare and cut medical cost. Howev er, in the past, classic efficacy studies are always focusing on comparing one new intervention with placebo under complete controlled environment. Now CER turns to comparing different interventions directly in real world of routine practice. This article reviewed a se ries of literature about the design, implementation and analysis of CER in order to give a clue for Chinese medicine researchers in fu ture.
出处 《中国中药杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期930-935,共6页 China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica
基金 中国中医科学院第六批自主选题项目(Z0215) 2012年度留学人员科技活动项目择优项目(Z0241) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(81173472)
关键词 比较效益研究 中医临床研究 研究设计 comparative effectiveness research clinical research research design
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Garrison LP Jr, Neumann P J, Radensky P,et al. A flexible ap- proach to evidentiary standards for comparative effectiveness re- search [ J]. Health Aft ( Millwood), 2010,29(10) :1812.
  • 2Sox H C. Comparative effectiveness research: a progress report [ J]. Ann Intern Med, 2010,153(7) :469.
  • 3Dreyer N A, Tunis S R, Berger M, et al. Why observational studies should be among the tools used in comparative effective- ness research [ J ]. Health Aft ( Millwood ) , 2010,29 ( 10 ) : 1818.
  • 4Patient Protection Affordable Care Act-H. R. 3590 [ EB/OL]. 2012-8-10. http://www, opencongress, org/bill/lll-h3590/ show.
  • 5Institute of Medicine. Initial national priorities for comparative ef- fectiveness research[ M ]. Washington, DC : The National Acade- mies Press, 2009.
  • 6Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Re- search. Report to the president and congress[ D ]. Washington, DC : Department of Health and Human Services, 2009.
  • 7Conway P H, Clancy C. Charting a path from comparative effec- tiveness funding to improved patient-centered health care [ J]. J Amer Med Assoc, 2010,303 ( 10 ) :985.
  • 8谢雁鸣,廖星,王永炎.将比较效益研究理念引入中医临床评价研究[J].中西医结合学报,2011,9(8):813-818. 被引量:17
  • 9谢雁鸣,廖星.对比较效益研究GRACE准则的解析[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2012,32(8):1121-1125. 被引量:6
  • 10Institute of Medicine. Learning what works best: The nation's need for evidence on comparative effectiveness in health care 2007 [ EB/OL]. 2013-1-7. http://www, iom. edu/ebm-effectiveness.

二级参考文献15

  • 1Center for Medical Technology Policy.Comparative effectiveness definitions. http://www.cmtpnet.org/comparative-effectiveness/comparative-effectiveness-definitions . 2011
  • 2Drozda JP,Bufalino VJ,Fasules J W,Peterson ED,Redberg RF,Wright JS,Allen J M.ACC2009Advocacy Position Statement:Principles for comparative effectiveness research[].Journal of the American College of Cardiology.2009
  • 3National Information Center on Health Services Research and Health Care Technology (NICHSR).Comparative effectiveness research (CER) (Also known as patient-centered outcomes research)[]..2011
  • 4The Congress of the United States,Congressional Budget Office.Research onthe comparative effectiveness of medical treat ments:issues and options for an expanded federal role[].https://wwwecriorg/Documents/CERC/CBO_--ComparativeEffectivenesspdf.2011
  • 5Manchikanti L,Falco FJ,Boswell MV,Hirsch JA.Facts,fallacies,and politics of comparative effectiveness research:PartⅠ.Basic considerations[].Pain Physician.2010
  • 6.Comparative effectiveness:its origin,evolution,and influence on health care[].J Oncol Pract.2009
  • 7Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.About PCOR. http://www.pcori.org/aboutus.ht ml . 2011
  • 8U.S.Government Accountability Office.GAO announces appointments to new Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)Board of Governors. http://www.gao.gov/press/pcori2010sep23.ht ml . 2011
  • 9Patel K.Health reform s tortuous route to the patient-centered outcomes researchinstitute[].Health Affairs.2010
  • 10Center for Medical Technology Policy.Overview of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. http://www.cmtpnet.org/comparative-effectiveness/overview-of-the-patient-centered-outcomes-research-institute . 2011

共引文献19

同被引文献38

  • 1王兵,陈颖超,梁永康,郑大超,陆艺,蒋萌.结直肠癌多学科专业数据库的初步建立[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2011,31(7):1055-1057. 被引量:5
  • 2温晓甦,韩爱玲,胡梁南,喻娟.国产与进口吉西他滨在治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌中的成本效果分析[J].实用癌症杂志,2014,29(1):107-108. 被引量:2
  • 3余学庆,李建生,李素云,王大中,王明航.两种慢性阻塞性肺疾病治疗方案的成本-效果分析[J].辽宁中医杂志,2006,33(3):294-295. 被引量:5
  • 4"Patient - Centered Outcomes Research Institute ( PCORI ). Preliminary Draft Methodology Report : Our Questions, Our Decisions : Standards for Patient - centered OutcomesResearch," 2012 - 7 - 23, http://pcori. org/assets/Preliminary - Draft - Methodology - Report. pdf.
  • 5Witt CM, Chesney M, Gliklich R, Green L, Lewith G, Luce B, et al. Building a strategic framework for comparative effectiveness research incomplementary and integrative medicine [ J]. eCAM, 2012. Article ID 531096, doi : 10.1155/2012/531096.
  • 6Grapow MT, yon Wattenwyl R, Guller U, Beyersdorf F, Zerkowski HR. Randomized controlled trials do not reflect reality:real -world analyses are critical for treatment guidelines[ J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2006, 132(1) :5 -7.
  • 7Erin Halve, Patricia Pittman. Cost and volume of current eomparativeef- fectiveness research[ EB/OL]. [ 2008 -10 -3 ]. http ://www. nhpf. org /library/handouts/Holve. slides_10 -03 -08. pdf.
  • 8Witt CM,Manheimer E, Hammerschlag R, Ludtke R, Lao L, et al. How well do randomized trials inform decision making:systematic review u- sing comparative effectiveness research measures on acupuncture for back oain [J ]. PLoS ONE,2012,7 ( 2 ) : e32399.
  • 9Chang DC, Yu PT, Easterlin MC, Talamini MA. Demystifying sample - size calculation for clinical trials and comparative effectiveness research : the impact of low - event frequency in surgical clinical research [ J ]. Surg Endosc,2013,27(2) :359 -363.
  • 10李寅超,赵宜红.从医学模式的变迁论中医整体模式的价值与特色[J].时珍国医国药,2008,19(2):480-481. 被引量:4

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部