期刊文献+

机构投资者、股权分置改革与股市波动性——基于MCMC估计的t分布误差MS-GARCH模型 被引量:14

Institutional investors,sub-owned shares reform and stock returns volatility:MCMC estimation of a MS-GARCH model with student-t error
原文传递
导出
摘要 从2003年开始,中国机构投资者占股市流通市值中的比例迅速增长.论文以这段时期上证指数的日收益率序列为研究对象,改进了最新的t分布误差MS-GARCH模型,运用马尔科夫链蒙特卡罗模拟(MCMC)对该模型进行了估计,为研究股权分置改革、机构投资者对股市收益率波动的影响提供了新的证据.研究发现,股权分置改革使股市波动性发生了结构性改变,股市由低波动风险期转换为高波动风险期;各类基金的总净值和仓位给股市波动性带来的影响有显著差异,存款准备金率和利率的调整也会影响股市波动性.最后,MS-GARCH模型对股市数据的拟合度和预测效率等都优于单状态GARCH模型. There is a dramaticMly increase in institutionM investors ownership of Chinese stock market from 2003. In this paper, we improve the MS-GARCH model to analyze the daily returns data, and provide empirical evidence on the impact of sub-owned shares reform and institutional investors in stock market. We find that Chinese stock market transform form low volatility state to high volatility state after the sub-owned shares reform. The results also prove that different funds have vary effects on the volatility of the stock market, and the adjusting of interest rate and reserve ratio could also affect the the volatility of the stock market. According to the comparison between two models, MS-GARCH model is much better than single-regime GARCH model in goodness-of fit and forecasting performance.
作者 魏立佳
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期545-556,共12页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 2010年度教育部"博士研究生学术新人奖" 中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金(201122G011)
关键词 机构投资者 股权分置改革 MS-GARCH模型 波动 t分布 institutional investors sub-owned shares reform MS-GARCH volatility student-t
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Lakonishok J,Shleifer A,Vishny R W. The impact of institutional trading on stock prices[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1992.23-43.
  • 2Grinblatt M,Titman S,Wermers R. Momentum investment strategies,portfolio performance,and herding:A study on mutual fund behavior[J].American Economic Review,1995.1088-1105.
  • 3Sias R W,Starks L T. Return autocorrelation and institutional investors[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1997.103-131.
  • 4Nofsinger J R,Sias R W. Herding and feedback trading by institutional and individual investors[J].Journal of Finance,1999.2263-2295.
  • 5Wermers R. Mutual fund herding and the impact on stock prices[J].Journal of Finance,1999.581-622.
  • 6Badrinath S G,Wahal S. Momentum trading by iustitutions[J].Journal of Finance,2002.2449-2478.
  • 7Griffin J M,Harris J H,Topaloglu S. The dynamics of institutional and individual trading[J].Journal of Finance,2003,(6):2285-2320.doi:10.1046/j.1540-6261.2003.00606.x.
  • 8Sias R,Whidbee D A. Are institutional or individual investors more likely to drive prices from fundamentals[R].Washington State University,2006.
  • 9Yan X,Zhang Z. Institutional investors and equity returns:Are short-term institutions better informed[J].Review of Financial Studies,2009,(02):893-924.
  • 10Cohen R B,Gompers P A,Vuolteenaho T. Who underreacts to cash-flow news? Evidence from trading between individuals and institutions[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2002.409-462.

二级参考文献120

共引文献211

同被引文献191

引证文献14

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部