摘要
马克思在《给维·伊·查苏利奇的复信(初稿)》中提出,"从理论上说"和"从历史的观点来看",俄国存在着走新式社会发展道路的可能性,因为俄国"农村公社"和西方资本主义生产同时存在,它能够吸收西方的一切积极成果,而不必经受资本主义发展的波折和痛苦。但从俄国的现实看,农村公社"几乎陷入绝境",俄国走新式社会发展道路的可能性趋于消失。马克思在俄国社会发展道路上的两种设想,体现了发展道路选择上的灵活性和可变性。
In "A Reply to V. E. Zasulich", Marx points out that, "in theory" and "from a historical point of view", there exists a possibility for Russia to take on a new-type course of social development, because "village community" and capitalism co-exist in Russia, which can intake all positive results of western counlries without suffer- ing from the setbacks and pains of capitalist development. However, in view of the Russia reality, village community was almost driven to the last ditch, so it was almost impossible for Russia to take on the new-type course of social development. Marx's two conceptions of Russia's social development road reflect the flexibility and variability in the choice of development roads.
出处
《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第2期5-12,共8页
Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University
基金
2011年国家社会科学基金重点项目"经典作家关于落后国家社会发展的重要著作和基本理论研究"(11AKS002)
江苏省高校哲学社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"马克思主义东方社会学说与中国实践的验证"(苏教社政[2010]2号)
江苏省优势学科建设工程资助项目
关键词
马克思
新式社会发展道路
'农村公社'
陷入绝境
Marx
new-type social development road
"village community"
be driven to the last ditch