期刊文献+

企业市场战略与非市场战略的整合模式及其绩效影响 被引量:15

The firm's Integration Model of Market and Non-market Strategy and Its Performance Implications
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文考察了企业市场战略与非市场战略整合的行为模式及其绩效表现。主要结论:第一,本文实证地识别出了企业战略整合的三种行为模式,即事项整合、战略互动与战略协同,其中战略协同是一种内部整合模式,而事项整合与战略互动是两种外部整合模式;第二,进一步实证地发现了三者间的关联性。其中事项整合对战略互动、战略互动对战略协同以及事项整合对战略协同均存在显著性的正向作用;第三,战略整合模式与企业绩效总体上存在显著的相关性。其中事项整合对市场绩效不存在显著影响,对经营合法性存在显著的负向影响;战略互动与战略协同均只对市场绩效存在显著性影响,而与经营合法性不存在显著相关性。 This paper explores the firm's integration model of market and non-market strategy and its impact on the performance. The main results are as follows: Firstly, this paper empirically recognizes three types of behavioral models of the firm's strategic management, including issue integration, strategic interaction and strategic synergy. Strategic synergy is an internal integration model, while issue integration and strategic interaction are two types of external integration model. Secondly, this paper empirically discusses the relationship among these three behavioral models. Issue integration positively influences strategic interaction, meanwhile, strategic interaction positively affects strategic synergy as well as issue integration has a significant positive effect on strategic synergy. Thirdly, strategic integration model is significantly associated with the firm's performance on the whole. Issue integration affects the performance not significantly, while has a negative striking influence on the legitimacy. Strategic interaction and strategic synergy significantly affect the performance, while have no association with the legitimacy.
作者 邓新明 朱登
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期135-148,共14页 Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71272232) 武汉大学自主科研项目(人文社会科学) 中央高校基本科研业务费项目(2012YB054)
关键词 市场战略 非市场战略 整合战略 市场绩效 经营合法性 market strategy, non-market strategy, integration strategy, performance, legitimacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献70

  • 1Astley, W., Graham, van de Ven, et al. Central Perspectives and Debates in Organization Theory[J]. Administrative Science Quar- terly, 1983,28(2):245-273.
  • 2Bain, J. S. Industrial Organization[M]. New York: Wiley, 1954.
  • 3Porter, M. E. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance[M]. New York: Free Press, 1985.
  • 4Baron, D. P. Integrated Strategy: Market and Non-market Components[J]. California Management Review, 1995a,37(2):47-65.
  • 5DiMaggio, Paul, J., Powell Walter, W. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organization Field[J]. American Sociological Review, 1983,48(2):147-160.
  • 6Baron, D. P. The Non-market Strategy System[J]. Sloan Management Review, 1995b,37(1):73-86.
  • 7Baron, D. P. Business and Its Environment, 5th Ed[M]. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2006.
  • 8Tan, J., Tan, D. Environment-Strategy Co-evolution and Co-alignment: A Staged model of Chinese SOEs Under Transition[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005,26(2):141-157.
  • 9Grant, R. M. The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation[J]. California Management Review, 1991,33(3):1 14-135.
  • 10Epstein, E. The Corporation in American Politics[M]. N J: Prentice-Hall, 1969.

二级参考文献154

共引文献474

同被引文献202

引证文献15

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部