摘要
哈贝马斯和鲍德里亚在生产领域之外考察了人与人之间社会关系的形成,并强调交往、消费和象征等文化因素的重要作用。哈贝马斯以交往理性为基础试图重建历史唯物主义,而鲍德里亚则设想回归到象征交换主导的原始社会,并以拟像的进程解释历史的发展。哈贝马斯和鲍德里亚都未能充分理解马克思劳动概念的多重涵义,从而在考察历史发展过程中忽视了物质生产的基础性作用。
Habermas and Baudrillard researched into the social relation between people outside the production areas and emphasized the significance of cultural factors such as communication, consumption and symbols. Haber- mas attempted to reconstruct the historical materialism based on the theory of communicative rationality. But Bau- drillard considered to return to the primitive society that was led by symbolic exchange, and explained the historical development by resorting to the precession of simulacra. Habermas and Baudrillard both failed to fully understand the multiple implications of Marx's labor concept. Therefore, they neglected the basic role of material production in their study of the social and historical development.
出处
《广州大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2013年第1期35-40,共6页
Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金项目(12CKS032)
关键词
劳动
交往
象征交换
哈贝马斯
鲍德里亚
labor
communication
symbolic exchange
Habermas
Baudrillard