期刊文献+

基于集合卡尔曼滤波的地表水热通量同化研究 被引量:4

Assimilation of surface water heat flux using Ensemble Kalman Filter
下载PDF
导出
摘要 地表水热通量是研究地表能量转换与水文过程中的重要参数,本文借助通用陆面模式CLM3.0(Community Land Model3.0)为动力框架,利用集合卡尔曼滤波作为同化算法构建单站点的地表水热通量同化系统,并利用Ameriflux通量观测网上Chestnut Ridge、ARM SGP Main以及Tonzi Ranch三个站点的通量观测数据进行直接同化地表水热通量试验。结果表明,在三种不同下垫面下,RMSE直接同化水热通量能够很好地改善地表总水热通量的估算效果。经过同化通量观测值,模式输出的通量值的RMSE均有减小。在代表农田下垫面的ARM SGP Main站,感热通量的RMSE由67.49W/m2下降至14.07W/m2,潜热通量的RMSE由70.07W/m2下降至14.35W/m2;在代表森林下垫面的Chestnut Ridge站,感热通量的RMSE由82.56W/m2下降至48.56W/m2,潜热通量的RMSE由42.99W/m2下降至38.92W/m2;在代表草地下垫面的Tonzi Ranch站,感热通量的RMSE由62.99W/m2下降至17.85W/m2,潜热通量的RMSE由44.76W/m2下降至36.01W/m2。相对于通过同化地表温度和湿度间接改善地表水热通量预报的研究结果,直接同化地表水热通量的结果好于前者。但值得注意的是,针对集合同化方法,不同初始场误差、观测误差和大气强迫数据误差的扰动强度都会对同化结果造成影响。从同化系统对3种误差的敏感性分析结果来看:观测误差的影响最大且减小观测误差能够减小同化后的RMSE值,估计观测误差的方法是否合理会直接影响同化结果的好坏;初始场误差对同化后的RMSE值影响最小;另外,增加大气强迫数据误差和初始场误差能减小同化后的RMSE值。 Water and heat fluxes exchange between biosphere and bottom atmosphere are indispensable parts in understanding the surface energy conversion and hydrological cycle processes happening on the land surface. Estimation and prediction of fluxes have immense research significance in fields of environmental protection, agricultural production and climate prediction. Land surface model is a powerful tool to obtain space-time continuous fluxes despite its poor simulation accuracy. The state-of-the-art data assimilation method provides a way to solve this problem. With the help of the offline version of Community Land Model CLM3.0 as a dynamic framework, we use the Ensemble Kalman Filter assimilation algorithm to build a single-site surface water and heat fluxes assimilation system. The algorithm perform an ensemble simulation to estimate initial condition error covariance and observational error covariance for the objective dynamic model and analyze background diagnostic outputs by calculating a weighted mean with observations. Perturbations on surface initial condition, atmospheric forcing data and observations are generated by a random sampling strategy based on the supposition of normal distribution with a priori mean and standard deviation for all variables. Data from three flux observing sites from Ameriflux flux observational network (Chestnut Ridge, ARM SGP Main and Tonzi Ranch) which stand for three different land surface conditions are engaged in parallel experiments to test the system and evaluate the effectiveness of flux assimilation under the framework of land model. Before processing further experiment, an optimal ensemble size was selected by evaluating outputs of latent heat from models with different ensemble size RMSE. The results of parallel experiments showed that direct assimilation of sensible and latent heat fluxes can improve the estimates of total surface sensible and latent heat fluxes in all three types of underlying land surface condition. In ARM SGP Main site, a typical case for cropland ground type, RMSE of sensible heat flux decreased from 67.49W/m2 to 14.07 W/m2 and that of latent heat flux decreased from 70.07 W/m2 to 14.35 W/m2. In Chestnut Ridge site that stands for forestry, RMSE of sensible heat flux dropped from 82.56 W/m2 to 48.56 W/m2 and that of latent heat flux fell from 42.99 W/m2 to 38.92 W/m2, respectively. Tonzi Ranch, a grassland site, RMSE in is also diminished by assimilating in situ observations with decrements of 45.14W/m2 for sensible heat flux and 8.75 W/m2 for latent heat flux. Furthermore, by comparing the results we gained above with mainstream study that focusing on assimilation of surface temperature and humidity to indirectly improve the fluxes prediction, we conclude that under the dynamic framework of community land model the flux outputs from direct assimilation model are better than those from surface state assimilation model. It is noteworthy that the accuracy of observational error estimation will directly affect the assimilation results though errors from initial condition, observation and atmospheric forcing will make contributions simultaneously.
出处 《农业工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期82-90,共9页 Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金(41101037) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助课题(20100076120024) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项(华东师范大学) 地理信息科学教育部重点实验室主任基金(KLGIS2011C06)
关键词 通量 卡尔曼滤波 潜热 通用陆面模式 陆面数据同化 观测误差 flux Kalman filter latent heat Community Land Model land surface data assimilation observational error
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Lahoz W, Swinbank R., Khattatov B. Data assimilation: making sense of observations[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2009, 549-597.
  • 2Entekhabi D, Nakamura H, Njoku E G. Solving the inverse problem for soil moisture and temperature profiles by sequential assimilation of multifrequency remotely sensed observations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1994, 32(2): 438-448.
  • 3Walker J P, Houser P R. A methodology for initializing soil moisture in a global climate model: Assimilation of near-surface soil moisture observations[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2001, 106(D11): 11761 - 11774.
  • 4Bouttier F, Mahfouf J F, Noilhan J. Sequential assimilation of soil moisture from atmospheric low-level parameters, part Ⅰ: Sensitivity and calibration studies[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 1993, 32(8): 1335- 1351.
  • 5Crow W T, Wood E F. The assimilation of remotely sensed soil brightness temperature imagery into a land surface model using Ensemble Kalman filtering: a case study based on ESTAR measurements during SGP97[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2003, 26(2): 137- 149.
  • 6M G, Radakovich J D, da Silva A, et al. Skin temperature analysis and bias correction in a coupled land-atmosphere data assimilation system[J]. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 2007, 85(A): 205-228.
  • 7De Lannoy G J M, Houser P R, Pauwels V R N, et al. State and bias estimation for soil moisture profiles by an ensemble Kalman filter: Effect of assimilation depth and frequency[J]. Water Resources Research, 2007, 43(6): W06401.
  • 8De Lannoy G J M, Houser P R, Verhoest N E C, et al. Adaptive Soil Moisture Profile Filtering for Horizontal Information Propagation in the Independent Column-Based CLM2.0[J]. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 2009, 10(3): 766-779.
  • 9Meng C L, Li Z L, Zhan X, et al. Land surface temperature data assimilation and its impact on evapotmnspiration estimates from the Common Land Model[J]. Water Resources Research, 2009, 45(2): W02421.
  • 10徐同仁,刘绍民,秦军,梁顺林.同化MODIS温度产品估算地表水热通量[J].遥感学报,2009,13(6):989-1009. 被引量:10

二级参考文献160

共引文献235

同被引文献51

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部