期刊文献+

腋窝淋巴结转移乳腺癌患者的分子分型与临床病理特征和预后的关系 被引量:10

Association of molecular subtyping with clinicopathologic features and prognosis in breast cancer patients with axillary lymph node metastasis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腋窝淋巴结转移的乳腺癌患者的分子分型与临床病理特征和预后的关系。方法:回顾性分析181例可手术的腋窝淋巴结转移乳腺癌患者的临床病理资料,并对这些患者进行分子分型。所有患者的随访时间为44~68个月,中位随访时间为58个月。对乳腺癌患者的年龄、原发肿瘤大小、腋窝淋巴结转移个数和分子分型进行预后相关因素分析。结果:181例乳腺癌患者分成luminal型(105例,58.0%)、人表皮生长因子受体2(human epidermal growth factor receptor2,HER-2)过表达型(32例,17.7%)和basal-like型(44例,24.3%)。HER-2过表达型患者的原发肿瘤较大,腋窝淋巴结转移个数较多。Luminal型、basal-like型和HER-2过表达型患者的复发率分别为17.1%(18/105)、31.8%(14/44)和37.5%(12/32),差异有统计学意义(P=0.026);luminal型、basal-like型和HER-2过表达型患者的死亡率分别为6.7%(7/105)、13.6%(6/44)和18.8%(6/32),其中luminal型与非luminal型患者的死亡率差异有统计学意义(P=0.048)。Luminal型患者的5年无病生存率明显高于HER-2过表达型和basal-like型患者(P=0.025),luminal型患者的5年总生存率也明显高于HER-2过表达型患者(P=0.039)。预后相关因子分析结果显示,腋窝淋巴结转移个数和分子分型均是独立的预后因素(P<0.05)。结论:在未使用分子靶向药物治疗的情况下,在腋窝淋巴结转移的乳腺癌患者中,HER-2过表达型患者的预后最差,luminal型患者的预后最佳。腋窝淋巴结转移个数和分子分型均是乳腺癌患者的独立预后因素。 Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the association of different molecular subtypes with the clinicopathologic features and the prognosis in breast cancer patients with axillary lymph node metastasis. Methods: The clinicopathologic information of 181 operable breast cancer patients with axillary lymph node metastasis was retrospectively analyzed. These patients were classified into different groups according to molecular subtyping. All patients were followed-up with a median of 58 months (range: 44-68 months). The multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic indicators among the potential factors including age, primary tumor size, number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes and molecular subtype. Results: Of all 181 patients, 58.0% (1 05/1 81) were luminal subtype,24.3% (44/1 81) were basal-like subtype, and 17.7% (32/1 81) were HER-2 overexpression subtype. HER-2 overexpression was closely associated with increased tumor size and more positive lymph nodes. The relapse rates of luminal, basal-like and HER-2 overexpression subtypes were 17.1% (1 8/105), 31.8% (14/44) and 37.5% (12/32), respectively (P = 0.026); the death rates of luminal, basal-like and HER-2 overexpression subtypes were 6.7% (7/105), 13.6% (6/44) and 18.8% (6/32), respectively (luminal vs non-luminal, P = 0.048). The five-year disease-free survival rate of patients with luminal subtype was much higher than those of the patients with HER-2 overexpression and basal-like subtypes (log-rank test, P = 0.025); the five-year overall survival rate of patients with luminal subtype was also much higher than that of patients with HER-2 overexpression subtype (log-rank test, P = 0.039). COX proportional hazards model revealed that primary tumor size and the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes were both independent prognostic indicators (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion: In axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer patients not receiving targeted molecular therapy, the subtype of HER-2 overexpression has the worst prognosis while the subtype of luminal has the best. The primary tumor size and the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes were both independent prognostic indicators for breast cancer patients.
出处 《肿瘤》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期271-275,共5页 Tumor
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 腋窝淋巴结转移 分子分型 生存 预后 Breast neoplasms Axillary lymph node metastasis Molecular subtyping Survival Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1WESOLOWSKI R, RAMASWAMY B. Gene expression profiling: changing face of breast cancer classification and management[J]. Gene Expr, 2011, 15(3):105-115.
  • 2李开富,康骅.乳腺癌生物学特性预测新辅助化疗敏感性的研究现状[J].肿瘤,2012,32(12):1030-1034. 被引量:3
  • 3GOLDHIRSCH A, WOOD W C, COATES A S, et al. Strategies for subtypes--dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 201 l[J]. Ann Oncol, 2011,22(8):1736-1747.
  • 4THERIAULT R L, LITTON J K, MITTENDORF E A, et al. Age and survival estimates in patients who have node-negative Tlab breast cancer by breast cancer subtype[J]. C/in Breast Cancer, 2011, 11(5):325-331.
  • 5AMAR S, MCCULLOUGH A E, TAN W, et al. Prognosis and outcome of small (:1 cm), node-negative breast cancer on the basis of hormonal and HER-2 status[J]. Oncologist, 2010, 15(10):1043-1049.
  • 6PEROU C M, SORLIE T, EISEN M B, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumors[J]. Nature, 2000, 406(6797):747-752.
  • 7IHEMELANDU C U, LEFFALL L D JR, DEWlTTY R L, et al. Molecular breast cancer subtypes inpremenopausal and postmenopausal African- American women: age-specific prevalence and survival[J].J Surg Res, 2007, 143(1 ):109-118.
  • 8袁中玉,王树森,朱美琴,郑磊,罗文标,周中梅,管忠震.不同分子亚型乳腺癌的临床特征和预后[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2008,30(6):456-461. 被引量:55
  • 9RAY M, POLITE B N. Triple-negative breast cancers: a view from 10,000 feet[J]. Cancer J, 2010, 16(1):17-22.
  • 10CHUANG E, CHRISTOS P, FLAM A, et al. Breast cancer subtypes in Asian-Americans differ according to Asian ethnic group[J].J Immigr Minor Health, 2012, 14(5):754-758.

二级参考文献56

  • 1<乳腺癌HER2检测指南>编写组,霍临明.乳腺癌HER2检测指南[J].中华病理学杂志,2006,35(10):631-633. 被引量:164
  • 2van't Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, et al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature, 2002, 415:530-536.
  • 3Sotiriou C, Neo SY, MeShane LM, et al. Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population based study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2003, 100: 10393- 10398.
  • 4Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Green AR, et al. Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer, 2007, 109:25-32.
  • 5Jones C, Nonni AV, Fulford L, et al. CGH analysis of ductal carcinoma of the breast with basaloid/myoepithelial cell differentiation. Br J Cancer, 2001, 85:422-427.
  • 6Cunningham JE, Butler WM. Racial disparities in female breast cancer in South Carolina: clinical evidence for a biological basis. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2004, 88 : 161-176.
  • 7Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA, 2006, 295:2492-2502.
  • 8Lohrisch C, Piccart M. An overview of HER2. Semin Oncol, 2001, 28(6 Suppl 18) :3-11.
  • 9Vicini FA, Recht A. Age at diagnosis and outcome for women with ductal carcinoma-in-situ of the breast: a critical review of the literature. J Clin Oncol, 2002, 20:2736-2744.
  • 10Foulkes WD, Stefansson IM, Chappuis PO, et al. Germline BRCA1 mutations and a basal epithelial phenotype in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2003, 95:1482-1485.

共引文献104

同被引文献85

  • 1谭晶晶,刘文,祖旭宇.肿瘤微环境与乳腺肿瘤发生发展关系的研究进展[J].肿瘤防治研究,2014,41(3):274-279. 被引量:6
  • 2梅欣,郭小毛,章倩.乳腺癌术后腋窝淋巴结转移对放疗的指导意义[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2006,11(4):295-299. 被引量:3
  • 3孟洁,张瑾.年轻女性乳腺癌临床资料分析[J].中国肿瘤临床,2006,33(22):1316-1320. 被引量:37
  • 4李连弟,鲁凤珠,张思维,牧人,孙秀娣,皇甫小梅,孙杰,周有尚,欧阳宁慧,饶克勤,陈育德,孙爱明,薛志福,夏毅.中国恶性肿瘤死亡率20年变化趋势和近期预测分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1997,19(1):3-9. 被引量:869
  • 5PEROU CM, SORLIE T, EISEN MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours[J]. Nature, 2000, 406(6797): 747-752.
  • 6SORLIE T, PEROU CM, TIBSHIRANI R, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2001, 98(19): 10869-10874.
  • 7IHEMELANDU CU, LEFFALL LD, DEWITYY RL, et al. Molec- ular breast cancer subtypes in premenopausal and postmenopausal African-American women:age-specific prevalence and survival[J]. J Surg Res, 2007, 143(1): 109-118.
  • 8ZHAO J, LIU H, WANG M, et al. Characteristics and prognosis for molecular breast cancer subtypes in Chinese women[J]. Surg Oncology, 2009, 100(2): 89-94.
  • 9PARK S, KO0 JS, KIM MS, et al. Charteristics and outcomes according to molecular subtypes of breast cancer as classified by a panel of four biomarkers using immunohistochemistry[J]. Breast, 2012, 21(1): 50-57.
  • 10DI LEO A, CHAN S, PACSMANS M, et al. HER-2/neu as a predictive marker in a population of advanced breast cancer patients randomly treated either with single-agent doxorubicin or single-agent docetaxed[J]. Breast Cancer Retreat, 2004, 86(3): 197-199.

引证文献10

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部