期刊文献+

企业健康促进现状评价指标体系的构建 被引量:5

A research on the construction of an assessment index system to evaluate the implementation of health promotion in enterprises
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的建立评价企业开展健康促进现状的指标体系。方法通过文献回顾、收集现场资料、专家访谈等定性研究方法,建立初步指标框架并编制专家咨询问卷。采用改良德尔菲专家咨询法,通过两轮咨询,由专家对指标重要性进行评分,根据20名专家的意见集中程度和协调程度,对指标进行增减、更改,并采用百分权重法确定各评价指标的权重。结果两轮咨询表回收率分别为90.91%和100.00%,专家整体权威系数为0.69,指标总体协调系数为0.623(P〈O.01),4大类指标的专家协调系数分别为0.313、0.625、0.390、0.563(P〈O.01)。构建成4大类10个二级指标、52个三级指标及其权重构成的指标体系。结论本指标体系具有较好的内容效度,可靠性和代表性得到专家认可,应进一步在企业中进行应用及验证。 Objective To establish an assessment index system to objectively evaluate the implementation of health promotion in enterprises. Methods Multi-methods, which include the reviewing references, the summarizing results of preliminary studies, the interview with experts and employers, were used in developing a tentative index framework and working out the consultative questionnaires. Then the improved Delphi Method was adopted in collecting ideas from 20 experts in China, and they scored the importance of every single index by two rounds of consultation. On the basis of these data, the indicators were added , deleted or modified according to concentration and distraction levels of expert ideas. The method of the percentile weighted coefficient was conducted to decide the weighing of assessment index. Results The responding rates to the two rounds of questionnaires were 90.91% and 100.00% respectively. The overall specialist authoritative coefficient was 0.69,the coordination coefficient of all indicators was 0.623 (P〈0.01),and the coordination coefficient of the four kinds of first-ranking indicators was 0.313, 0.625, 0.390, 0.563, respectively (P〈0.01). Eventually, an assessment index system consisting of 4 first-ranking indicators and 10 sub-indicators which were further divided into 52 grade-three indicators was set up. Conclusion The assessment index system possesses good content validity, and the liability and typicality were recognized by experts. However, it should be applied and validated in practice.
出处 《中华劳动卫生职业病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期233-237,共5页 Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases
基金 江苏省“十二五”科技兴卫工程医学创新团队与领军人才项目(LJ201130)
关键词 健康促进 工作场所 评价 德尔菲法 Health promotion, workplace Assessment index Delphi Method
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献111

共引文献274

同被引文献39

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部