期刊文献+

巨灾风险可保性研究 被引量:26

Insurability of Catastrophe Risk
原文传递
导出
摘要 以近年来巨灾保险相对萎缩的现实为背景,通过界定风险可保性来分析巨灾风险的可保性内涵以及影响巨灾风险可保性的因素。在此基础上,基于破产理论找出了巨灾风险的可保性边界,并给出了拓展巨灾风险可保性边界的政策建议。研究认为:巨灾风险的模糊性、低频高损失、难以聚合以及保险人的偿付能力、管理能力和经营目标等因素都可能会影响巨灾风险的可保性。具体而言,巨灾风险的可保性边界主要由保险人的初始资本金和保费附加共同决定,初始资本金越大、保费附加越高,巨灾风险的可保性边界就越宽,保险人的承保范围就越大。因此,通过提高保险人对巨灾风险认识、提高保险人的财务实力、对巨灾保险进行保费补贴、分保、共保以及通过资本市场和公共部门对巨灾风险进行融资均有助于扩大巨灾风险的可保性。 Based on the facts of the decrease of catastrophe insurance in recent years,we discussed the connotation of catastrophe risk insurability and affecting factors through defining the insurability of risks.Furthermore,we defined the boundary of catastrophe insurability on the basis of the ruin theory and offered some policy suggestions on how to expand the boundary.Factors such as ambiguity,low probability and large loss,and difficulty to pool the risk of catastrophes,and insurer's constraints of solvency,management skills and business targets could all have a negative influence on the insurance of catastrophe risk.Specifically speaking,the insurability boundary of catastrophe was determined by the initial capital and premium loading of the insurer.The higher the initial capital and the larger the premium loading,the wider the boundary would be.Therefore,to expand the boundary of the insurability for catastrophe risk,we should enhance the awareness for catastrophe,strengthen the insurer's financial capacity,offer premium subsidy on catastrophe insurance,utilize reinsurance and co-insurance operations,as well as raise fund through the capital market public institutions.All these should help to expand the insurability of catastrophes.
出处 《保险研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期3-13,共11页 Insurance Studies
基金 国家社科基金重大招标项目"我国巨灾保险制度安排与实施路径研究"(项目批准号:11&ZD053)资助
关键词 巨灾风险 可保性 破产理论 模糊性 可保性边界拓展 catastrophe riskst insurability ruin theory ambiguity boudary expansion for the insurability
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Arrow, K. J. , "Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care : reply ( the implications of transaction costs and adjustment lags)" ,The American Economic Review,1965,55(1/2) :154- 158.
  • 2Buhlmann ," premium calculation from top down", ASTIN Bulletin, 1985, ( 15 ) :89 - 101.
  • 3Courbage, C. and P. M. Liedtke," On insurability, its limits and extensions", Insurance research and practice, 2003,18(2) :44 -49.
  • 4Cummins, J. D. ," Should the government provide insurance for catastrophes. , Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review ,2006,88 (4) :337 - 379.
  • 5Dickson, D. C. M. , Insurance Risk and Ruin. Cambridge University Press,2005.
  • 6Eeckhoudt, L. , C. Gollier and H. Schlesinger," Changes in background risk and risk taking behavior", Econ- ometrica, 1996,64 ( 3 ) :683 - 689.
  • 7Freeman, P. K. and H. C. Kunreuther, "Insurability and Environmental Risks", The Law and Economics of the Environment, Edward Elgar,2003.
  • 8Giarini, O. ," Insurability and the economic relevance of insurance:a historical economic perspective", The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance ,1995, (77).
  • 9Gilboa, I. and D. Schmeidler," Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior", Journal of mathematical eco- nomics,1989,18 (2) :141 - 153.
  • 10Gollier, C. , "About the insurability of catastrophic risks", Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 1997,83 : 177 - 186.

二级参考文献18

  • 1张林源,杨锡金.论有效减灾与自然灾变过程[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,1994,5(4):19-25. 被引量:3
  • 2帕尔·科夫斯(匈)著,夏一成等译.指数理论与经济现实[M].北京:中国统计出版杜,1990.
  • 3史培军.综合灾害风险管理与巨灾风险防范对策[R].中国保险监督管理委员会讲座材料,2008.
  • 4徐国详.统计指数理论:方法与应用研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2011.
  • 5Alba Corzo. Measurement and Transfer of Catastrophic Risks:A Simulation Analysis [ M ]. ASTIN Bulletin Press, 2008.
  • 6Alexander, David. The Study of Natural Disasters, 1977 -1997: Some Reflections on a Changing Field of Knowledge [ J ]. Disasters. 1997,21 ( 4 ) : P284 - P304.
  • 7Cardona D, Hurtado J E, Chardon A C. Indicators of disaster risk and risk management Summary report for WCDR[ R]. Program for Latin America and the Caribbean IADB--UNC/IDEA,2005.
  • 8Jaimungal S, T Wang. Catastrophe Options with Stochastic Interest Rates and Compound Poisson Losses [ J].Mathematics and Economics,2006,38:469 - 483.
  • 9Kunreuther, H. and A. E. Kleffner. Should Earthquake Mitigation Measures BeVoluntary or Required? [ J ]. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 1992, (4) : 321 - 333.
  • 10数据是截至2008年9月25日12时新华社授权发布的国务院抗震救灾总指挥部关于汶川地震灾害损失数据的公报.中华人民共和国中央人民政府网http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2008-09/25/content-1105677.htm.

共引文献28

同被引文献354

引证文献26

二级引证文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部