期刊文献+

The Specificity and Universality of Chinese and Western Politeness

The Specificity and Universality of Chinese and Western Politeness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 礼貌是一种普遍存在的语用现象,但是由于文化、社会价值的差异,每种语言的礼貌又存在很大的不同。一些中国学者认为中国式礼貌具有自己的特殊性,西方的礼貌理论对中国是不适用的。本文通过对比英汉礼貌的异同,证明英汉礼貌虽然有诸多的不同,但是并没有必要将两者孤立而论。 Politeness is a universal pragmatic phenomenon, but due to different culture and social value, the politeness of each language may be diverse. Some Chinese scholars argue for the specificity of Chinese limao (politeness) and maintain that Western politeness theories are not applicable in China. Through comparing the difference and common points between Western and Chinese politeness, we can conclude that despite so much difference, there is not a East-West divide in politeness.
作者 张玲
机构地区 云南师范大学
出处 《神州》 2013年第6期172-172,共1页
关键词 英汉礼貌 特性 共性 Chinese and Western politeness, specificity, universality
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献33

  • 1Leech, Geoffrey (2003), 'Towards an anatomy of politeness in communication', International Journal of Pragmatics 14, 101-123.
  • 2Levinson, Stephen C. (1983), Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 3Liu, Runqing (1986), The Politeness Principle and A Dream of Red Mansions. Unpublished MPhil thesis, Lancaster University.
  • 4Mao, LuMing Robert (1994), 'Beyond politeness theory: 'Face' revisited and renewed,' Journal of Pragmatics 21, 451-86.
  • 5Matsumoto, Yoshiko (1989), 'Politeness and conversational universals - observations from Japanese', Multilingua, 8, 207-221.
  • 6Miller, R. A. (1967), The Japanese Language. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • 7Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen (1978), 'Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena. In: Esther N. Goody, ed., Questions and Politeness, 56-310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Reissued 1987 with corrections, new introduction and new bibliography, as a book entitled Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage.).
  • 8Brown, Roger W., and Gilman, Albert (1960), 'Pronouns of power and solidarity'. In T. A. Sebeok(ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 253-276. Reprinted in P. Giglioli (ed.)(1972), Language and Social Context. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, pp. 252-82.
  • 9Culpeper, Jonathan (1996). 'Towards an anatomy of impoliteness,' Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 349-367.
  • 10Culpeper, Jonathan (2005). 'Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link', Journal of Politeness Research 1:1, 35-72.

共引文献1208

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部