期刊文献+

微型种植体支抗在口腔正畸治疗中的临床效果分析 被引量:15

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨在口腔正畸治疗中应用微型种植体支抗的临床疗效。方法选取需要正畸的患者150例,随机将其分配为试验组和对照组,试验组应用微型种植体支抗方法,对照组则应用传统正畸方法,记录并分析其临床效果。结果试验组成功73例,且稳定性较高,对照组成功66例,比试验组成功率低,两组有显著差异,具有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组的磨牙移位比对照组少,上中切牙唇向移位距离均比对照组多,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在口腔正畸治疗中应用微型种植体支抗方法临床疗效优于传统正畸方法,且成功率较高,值得推广和应用。
作者 吴金海
出处 《中国医学工程》 2013年第1期52-53,共2页 China Medical Engineering
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献19

  • 1寻春雷,曾祥龙,王兴.自攻型微钛钉种植体支抗治疗骨性Ⅱ类双牙弓前突错He[J].口腔正畸学,2004,11(3):129-131. 被引量:14
  • 2寻春雷,曾祥龙,王兴.自攻型微钛钉种植体增强磨牙支抗的临床应用研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2004,39(6):505-508. 被引量:72
  • 3曾韶华,李强,林有籁,刘月华.安氏Ⅰ类露龈笑患者牙颌面软硬组织形态特征的研究[J].中国美容整形外科杂志,2007,18(2):147-150. 被引量:10
  • 4Ohmae M, Saito S, Morohasi T, et al. A clinical and histological evaluation of titanium mini-implants as anchors for orthodontic intrusion in the beagle dog [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofac ial Orthop ,2001,119 (5) :489-497.
  • 5Tjan AH, Miller GD, The JG. Some esthetic factvrs in smile [ J ]. J Prosthet Dent, 1984,51 ( 1 ) : 24-28.
  • 6Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diangsis and treatment planning - Partll[ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1993,103 ( 5 ) :395-411.
  • 7Monaco A, Streni O, Marci MC, et al. Gummy smile: clinical parameters useful for diagnosis and therapeutical approach [J].J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2004,29 ( 1 ) : 19-25.
  • 8Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment Planning -Part I[ J ]. Am J orthod and Dentofacial Orthop, 1993,103 (4) :299-312.
  • 9Hulsey CM. An esthetic evaluation of lip -teeth relationships present in the Smile[ J ]. Am J Orthod, 1970, 57(2) :132-44.
  • 10Foo M, Jones A, Darendeliler MA. Physical paroperties of root cementum : Part 9. Effect of systemic fluoride intake on root resorption in rates[ Jl. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orhtop,2007,131 ( 1 ) : 34-43.

共引文献48

同被引文献84

  • 1方颖峰,沈玥.探讨微型种植体支抗在口腔正畸中的临床应用[J].中国医疗美容,2014,4(3):217-217. 被引量:6
  • 2郭邑隆.国产微型自攻钛钉种植体支抗在正畸临床中的初步应用研究[J].包头医学院学报,2005,21(2):170-171. 被引量:11
  • 3陈岩,李云华,孟兴凯,杨荷荷.口腔正畸微种植体的实验研究[J].内蒙古医学院学报,2006,28(6):507-509. 被引量:20
  • 4Serra G, Morais LS, Elias CN, et al. Sequential bone healing of immediately loaded mini-implants: histomorphometric and fluorescence analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137(1 ):80-90.
  • 5Luzi C, Verna C, Melsen B. Immediate loading of orthodontic mini-implants: a histomorphometric evaluation of tissue reaction. Eur J Orthod. 2009; 31 (1):21-29.
  • 6Janssen KI, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, et al. Skeleta anchorage in orthodontics--a review of various systems in animal and human studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(1):75-88.
  • 7Cornelis MA, Schemer NR, De Clerck H J, et al. Systematic review of the experimental use of temporary skeletal anchorage devices in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131(4 Suppl):S52-58.
  • 8Torcasio A, van Lenthe GH, Van Oosterwyck H. The importance of loading frequency, rate and vibration for enhancing bone adaptation and implant osseointegration. Eur Cell Mater. 2008;16:56-68.
  • 9Gritsch K, Laroche N, Morgon L, et at. A systematic review of methods for tissue analysis in animal studies on orthodontic mini-implants. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2012;15(3): 135-147.
  • 10Hoste S, Vercruyssen M, Quirynen M, et al. Risk factors and indications of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a literature review. Aust Orthod J. 2008;24(2):140-148.

引证文献15

二级引证文献183

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部