期刊文献+

朝鲜使臣见闻记述之康雍史事考评——以争储及雍正继位为核心 被引量:1

On Korean Envoys' Records about the Events During Kangxi and Yongzheng:Focusing to the Contention for Crown Prince and Yongzheng's Accession
下载PDF
导出
摘要 李氏朝鲜遣清使臣,作为清朝历史见证者,留下了《燕行录》、《别单》、《闻见录》、《手本》等丰富的汉文文献。《别单》的记载尤为珍贵可信,里面所记史事,多有清朝文献所不详者。特别是涉及康熙后期争储和雍正帝继位的情况,清朝文献做了许多改窜、掩盖,而证之以朝鲜使臣的见闻记述,可以获得探明真相的重要线索。我们不能因为《承政院日记》、《朝鲜王朝实录》里面所记载的朝鲜君臣评论有误解、误断而否定"别单"等朝鲜使臣闻见记录的可信性及史料价值。 Lee's Korean envoys to Qing Dynasty,as the Historical witness of Qing,have left a lot of Chinese writings,such as Yan Xing Lu,Biedan,Wenjianlu and Shouben.The recordings of Biedan which record events that had been ignored by Qing's documents,are specially precious and believable.There are much tampering and concealing about contention for crown prince during late Kangxi,and Yongzheng's accession in Qing' recordings.We can get a little hit that let out the fact from the Korean envoys' recordings.There are many mistakes in Korean comments about Qing in Chengzhengyuan Riji and Chaoxian Wangchao Shilu.Nevertheless,we cannot deny the believability and historical value of the Korean envoys' recordings.
作者 罗冬阳
出处 《东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期48-54,共7页 Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2012)
关键词 别单 燕行录 争储 雍正继位 Biedan Yanxinglu Contention for Crown Prince Yongzheng's Accession
  • 相关文献

共引文献14

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部