水中分娩与传统分娩方式的临床结局比较

Comparison of clinical outcome between water birth and traditional mode of delivery

目的比较水中分娩与传统分娩方式对产妇的影响。方法选择68例水中分娩孕妇(水中分娩组)和68例同期经阴道分娩的孕妇(对照组)作为研究对象,比较2组在分娩过程中的产程、会阴裂伤程度、会阴侧切率及疼痛程度。结果水中分娩组活跃期较对照组缩短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组第2产程和第3产程时长比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。水中分娩组会阴裂伤程度、会阴侧切率及疼痛程度低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论水中分娩可减轻分娩疼痛、会阴裂伤程度,缩短产程。

Objective To compare the effect of water delivery and the traditional mode of delivery on puerperant.Methods Sixty-eight pregnant women with water delivery（water delivery group）and sixty-eight pregnant women with vaginal delivery（control group）were selected as the object of this study.The birth process,degree of perineal laceration,episiotomy rate and degree of pain were compared between the two groups.Results The active period of water delivery group was significantly shorter than that in control group（P0.05）;there were no significant difference of the second stage of labor and the third stage of labor between the two groups（P0.05）.The degree of perineal laceration,episiotomy rate and degree of pain in water delivery group were significantly lower than those in control group（P0.05）.Conclusion Water delivery can reduce the labor pain and degree of perineal laceration,shorten the birth process.