连续成立债权的代位行使

Continuous Claims of Subrogation

有息债权的债权人如何通过行使债务人对第三人连续成立的同类债权来实现自己的债权,是司法实践中比较难处理的问题。原因之一是我国的代位权制度主要着眼于债权及其效力的静态特征,对处于不断变化中的债权则难以划定权利代位的界限和代位的效力界限,使有息债权人在起诉以后发生的利息请求权无法从第三人处得到清偿,起诉之后债务人对第三人继续成立的同类债权无法被代位行使,债权人的债权无法在一次诉讼中得到足额清偿。按现行实体法和程序法原则,审判人员可以通过适当的程序活动,将债权人起诉以后形成的利息请求权纳入代位权的诉求范围,将债务人对第三人后续成立的同类债权纳入债权人代位行使范围,以保证债权人的债权在代位权诉讼中得到最大限度的清偿。

It is a difficult problem in judicial practice for the interest-bearing debt creditors how to realize the continuous claims on the similar creditor to a third party.One reason is that the subrogation rights system in China mainly focuses on the static characteristics of debt and its effect.And it is hard to delineate the boundaries of the rights of subrogation and its effectiveness boundaries of changing claims,which make the occurred interest claims of interest-bearing creditors not obtained from the third party after the prosecution.The similar continuous claims after the prosecution can not be subrogated and the claims of creditors can not be in full settlement of an action either.According to the current principle of substantive law and procedural law,the judge could incorporate the subrogation right of the demands scope,and meanwhile incorporate similar claims creditor of the subrogation range to ensure the maximum settlement of the claims of creditors in the right of subrogation litigation.