论提出抗诉为民事案件中止执行的充分条件

Protest:Sufficient Conditions for Civil Cases Stay of Execution

综观民事诉讼法的立法进程,作为审判监督和执行两个重要程序制度交叉组合契合点的人民检察院抗诉与人民法院决定再审同时中止原裁判执行之间,却始终并未建立起必要且合理的衔接规范,造成司法实践中操作争议和适用分歧。根据我国《民事诉讼法》和司法解释可知,抗诉的效力是必然启动再审程序。而无论启动原因如何,只要最终人民法院决定再审,通常情况下,其自然的伴生效力即包括裁定中止原裁判的执行。可见,依抗诉的提出而中止执行不是否定或突破再审功能与制度,而正是贯彻和彰显再审制度的意义与价值。

Overview the whole legislative progression of the civil procedure law,between people＇s Procuratorate protest and people＇s court decides retrial while suspended the initial decision implementation,which is the cross meeting point of two important systems-procedure for trial supervision and implementation,the necessary and rational convergence of norms has not been established.It caused controversy and differences of application in judicial practice operations.Under the judicial interpretation and the code of civil procedure,the effectiveness of protest is bound to start the retrial.As long as the court deciding retrial,under normal circumstances,its associated effects include found in the termination of the initial decision by the Executive.It is clear that stay of execution in accordance of protest is not denied retrial or breakthrough features and system,and it is followed up and highlights the significance and value of retrial.