摘要
目的:应用平面补片与网塞补片,进行腹股沟疝无张力修补术的应用与对比研究。方法:使用平面型聚丙烯补片行腹股沟疝无张力疝修补术304例,使用网塞型补片行腹股沟疝无张力疝修补术315例。比较两组手术时间、手术并发症。结果:两组手术时间、平均住院日、切口脂肪液化、阴囊水肿均无统计学意义。随访期间局部疼痛感无统计学意义,局部异物感两组比较有显著性差异。结论:两种补片用于腹股沟疝无张力疝修补术均具有创伤小、恢复快的特点。平面补片在疝修补术后异物感少,价格低的优点,可优先选用。
Objective:comparative study of application of planar patch with mesh plug patch, and the application of inguinal hernia tension-free repair.Method:Use a flat-type polypropylene mesh for inguinal hernia tension-free hernioplasty 304 eases, the use of mesh plug patch for inguinal hernia tension-free hernia repair 315 eases.Compar- isons were made in operative time, complications, and recurrence rate.Results:there was no statistical significance in operation time, average length of stay, the incision fat liquefaction, scrotal edema of the two groups. During follow-up, local pain, no statistically significant differences in relapse rate. Local foreign body sensation, the two groups were sig- nificantly different.Conclusion:The two patches for inguinal hernia tension-free hernia repair has a low recurrence rate, less trauma and faster recovery characteristics. Plane patch in hernia repair with less foreign body sensation and low price, can be preferred.
出处
《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》
2013年第1期55-56,共2页
Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College
关键词
腹股沟疝
无张力疝修补术
平面补片
网塞补片
inguinal hernia
tension-free hernia repair
a fiat patch
mesh plug patch