期刊文献+

不同栽培管理方式下土壤DTPA浸提态铁、锰、铜、锌含量差异分析 被引量:2

DTPA Exchangeable Soil Fe,Mn,Cu and Zn Contents in Different Cultivation Management
原文传递
导出
摘要 为探讨不同栽培管理方式下土壤DTPA浸提态铁(Fe)锰(Mn)铜(Cu)锌(Zn)含量的特征,采用野外采样及室内分析方法,对上海郊区大棚及露地栽培体系下有机和常规农业生产系统中土壤不同土层DTPA-Fe、Mn、Cu、Zn含量进行对比研究。结果表明,有机生产系统的DTPA-Fe、Mn、Cu、Zn含量均高于常规生产方式,露地有机园艺管理耕作层DTPA-Mn、Cu、Zn浓度高于常规管理,而DTPA-Fe则反之。统计分析结果表明,不同栽培管理方式对DTPA-Fe、Mn、Cu、Zn含量具有显著性影响,且大棚条件下更为明显。因此,不同栽培管理方式改变了土壤DTPA浸提态铁锰铜锌的分布及其特性。 The aim of this work w as to investigate the influence of different management practices on soil DTPA-extractable Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn contents in the cultivated soils. Soils under greenhouse and open field cultivation were sampled from the fields in Shanghai, China, where organic farming had been conducted for three years or conventional faming had been carried out in the same area. The results showed that the contents of soil DTPA-extractable Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn under organic management system were much larger than those under conventional management system. While soil DTPA-extractable Mn, Cu and Zn contents at 0-20 cm depth in the open field under organic management strategy were higher than those of conventional management. On the contrary, soil DTPA-Fe contents followed the different trend. ANOVA revealed that cultivation and management had a significant impact on the contents of soil DTPA-extractable Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn, especially under greenhouse condition. We concluded that the distribution and characteristics of soil exchangeable bases were changed significantly under different cultivation and management.
出处 《土壤通报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期428-431,共4页 Chinese Journal of Soil Science
基金 "十二五"国家科技支撑项目(2012BAD14B17) 湖南省自然科学基金(11JJ4030)资助
关键词 有机栽培 常规栽培 土层深度 土壤微量元素 生态环境 Organic cultivation Conventional cultivation Soil depth Soil microelement Ecosystem environment
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1葛体达,宋世威,黄丹枫.荷兰生态(有机)农业对上海农业发展的借鉴[J].农业环境与发展,2011,28(4):70-77. 被引量:9
  • 2葛体达 唐东梅 宋世威等.循环经济下的有机(生态)农业-可持续农业发展的方向.上海交通大学学报:农业科学版,2006,24:50-53.
  • 3聂三安,葛体达,肖和艾,Kozo Iwasaki,张杨珠.不同栽培管理方式下土壤交换性盐基特征差异分析[J].土壤通报,2011,42(5):1064-1069. 被引量:10
  • 4GE T, NIE S,WU J, et al. Chemical properties, microbial biomass,and activity differ between soils of organic and conventionalhorticultural systems under greenhouse and open field management: acase study [J]. J Soils Sediments, 2011, 11: 25 - 26.
  • 5greenhouse and open field horticultural soils under organic andconventional management: A case study [J]. Eur. J Soil Biol,2010,46: 371 - 374.
  • 6BULLUCK III L.R, BROSIUS M, EVANYLO G. K, et al. Organicand synthetic fertility amendments influence soil microbial, physicaland chemical properties on organic and conventional farms [J].Applied Soil Ecology, 2002,19(2):147 - 160.
  • 7GUNAPALA, N, SCOW, K. Dynamics of soil microbial biomass andactivity in conventional and organic farming systems [J]. Soil Biol.Biochem, 1998 (30): 805 - 816.
  • 8HARALDSEN T K, ASDAL A, Grasdalen C, et al. Nutrient balancesand yields during conversion from conventional to organic croppingsystems on silt loam and clay soils in Norway [J]. BiologicalAgriculture & Horticulture, 2000, 17: 229 - 246.
  • 9李德成,李忠佩,周祥,张桃林.不同使用年限蔬菜大棚土壤重金属含量变化[J].农村生态环境,2003,19(3):38-41. 被引量:43
  • 10GARCIA-RUIZ H, OCHOA V, VIEGLA B, et al. Soil enzymes,soil quality indicators in organic and conventional olive oil farming:Influence of seasonality and site features [J]. Appl Soil Ecol, 2009,41: 305 - 314.

二级参考文献83

共引文献355

同被引文献46

引证文献2

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部