技术迷思与发展传播研究被引量：6

Technological Myth and Development Communication Research

导出

摘要本文尝试识别并界定一种"技术迷思"的概念来回应当下发展传播研究停滞不前的困境。具体而言,在回顾发展传播学术思想的过程中,将"技术迷思"视为理解发展背景下媒介角色及作用的研究透镜,通过它检视发展传播知识生产中被强调和被忽略的方向,以发展传播研究不同范式针对"技术迷思"的"对话"来厘清范式间的复杂关系,同时反思技术迷思对发展传播理论的负面影响。 The paper identifies a ＂technological myth＂ to respond the dilemma of development communication research. Specifically, by reviewing the literature of academic thinking in development communication field, the concept of ＂technological myth＂ has been considered as research lens to understand the roles and functions of media in the context of development. The ＂dialogues＂ between different paradigms in development communication research towards ＂technological myth＂ has been employed to clarify the complexities among the paradigms.

作者李萌

机构地区华中科技大学新闻与信息传播学院

出处《国际新闻界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期69-76,共8页 Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication

关键词发展传播研究研究困境技术迷思 development communication research, research dilemma, technological myth

分类号 G206 [文化科学—传播学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1班努里(2001).发展与知识的政治:现代化理论在第三世界中的社会角色的批判诠释.载许宝强,汪晖(主编),《发展的幻象》.北京:中央编译出版社.
2陈崇山,孙五三(编)(1997).《人·媒介·现代化》.北京:中国社会科学出版社.
3保罗·弗莱雷.《被压迫者教育学》.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001年,第31页.
4文森特·莫斯可.《数字化崇拜》,黄典林译,北京,北京大学出版社,2010年,第3页.
5科林·斯巴克斯(2009).《全球化,社会发展与大众媒体》.北京:社会科学文献出版社.
6Fair, J. E. (1989). 29 years of theory and research on media and development: The dominant paradigm impact. Gazette, 44(2).
7Fair, J. & Shah, H. (1997). Continuities and discontinuities in communication and development research since 1958. The Journal of International Communication, 4(2), 3-23.
8Jacobson, T. (2006). Participatory communication as communicative action. In A. Gumucio-Dagron & T. Tufle (eds.), Communication for social change anthology: historical and contemporary readings (1st Ed.). Communication for Social Change Consortium Inc.
9Lerner, D. & Pevsner, L. W. (2000) The passing of traditional society: modernizing the middle east. In J. T. Roberts & A. Hite (eds.), From modernization to globalization: perspectives on development and social change. Wiley-Blackweil.
10Postman, N. (1996). The end of education: redefining the value of school (lst ech'tion). New York: Vintage.