期刊文献+

不同种牛粪干发酵产气特性比较试验研究 被引量:4

Experimental study on the characteristics of gas production from dry anaerobic digestion of different kinds of cattle manure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用干发酵技术处理3种不同种类的牛粪,比较了各种牛粪发酵的日产气量、累计产气量和产甲烷比例的差异。结果表明,相对于水牛粪和黄牛粪,奶牛粪干发酵产气的启动更快;累计产气量和平均容积产气率均以水牛粪为最高,黄牛粪次之,奶牛粪最低;3种牛粪干发酵过程中的产甲烷比例变化趋势大体上相似,在发酵初期由低到高逐渐增加,之后趋于平稳,其中水牛粪的产甲烷比例相对于奶牛粪和黄牛粪略高;总体来看,水牛粪干发酵的产气效果优于奶牛粪和黄牛粪,这为以后的相关研究或沼气工程设计中的原料选取提供了参考。 In this paper,comparative dry fermentation experiments were carried out to investigate the effect of cattle manure species on daily gas production, cumulative gas production and methane content. The results showed that the speed of start-up performance from fastest to slowest were cow manure, buffalo manure, cattle manure in sequence,while as to the cumulative gas production and average volume gas productivity from highest to lowest, they were buffalo manure, cattle manure, cow manure in sequence. The compositions of gas produced from dry fermentation of these three cattle manures were approximately similar. The methane content produced from fermentation of buffalo manure was higher than that from other two manures. Generally speaking, the effect of gas production from buffalo manure was better than that from cattle manure and cow manure. This paper provides reference for feedstocks selection in future related research or biogas engineering design.
出处 《环境污染与防治》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期57-60,65,共5页 Environmental Pollution & Control
基金 中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(No.0032012012)
关键词 奶牛粪 黄牛粪 水牛粪 干发酵 产气特性 cow manure cattle manure~ buffalo manure dry anaerobic digestion characteristics of gas production
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1袁立,王占哲,刘春龙.国内外牛粪生物质资源利用的现状与趋势[J].中国奶牛,2011(5):3-9. 被引量:44
  • 2祝其丽,李清,胡启春,罗安靖,青鹏,潘科.猪场清粪方式调查与沼气工程适用性分析[J].中国沼气,2011,29(1):26-28. 被引量:48
  • 3BOLZONELLA D,INNOCENTI L,PAVAN P,et al. Semi-dry thermophilic anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of mu- nicipal solid waste: focusing on the start-up phase[J]. Biore- sour. Teehnol. ,2003,86(2):123 -129.
  • 4MARTIN D J ,POTTS L G A, HESLOP V A. Reaction mecha- nisms in solid-state anaerobic digestion: 1. the reaction front hypothesis[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2003,81 (3) : 171-179.
  • 5FORSTER CARNEIRO T, PEREZ M, ROMERO L. Ther- mophilic anaerobic digestion of source-sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste [J]. Bioresour. Technol. , 2008, 99 (15) :6763-6770.
  • 6J HA A K, LI Jiangzheng, NIES L, et al. Research advances in dry anaerobic digestion process of solid organic wastes[J]. Af rican Journal of Biotechnology, 2011,65 (10) : 14242- 14253.
  • 7石利军,孙杰,孙占潮,张伟玉.畜禽粪便稻草混合干式发酵产沼气试验研究[J].天津农业科学,2011,17(4):5-9. 被引量:9
  • 8罗艳丽,郑春霞,贾宏涛,等.牛粪常温厌氧发酵特性的试验研究[J].2010,47(5):976-979.
  • 9CAVINATO C, FATONE F, BOLZONELLA D, et al. Ther- mophilic anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure with agro wastes and energy crops: comparison ozf pilot and full scale ex- periences[J]. Bioresour. Technol. , 2010,101 (2) : 545-550.
  • 10ELENA C, MAURIZIO R, VINCENZO R. Investigation of increasing organic loading rate in the co-digestion of energy crops and cow manure mix[J]. Bioresour. Technol. , 2010, 101(9) :3013-3019.

二级参考文献58

共引文献124

同被引文献57

  • 1苗泽华,董莉.制药企业环境污染治理模式与途径——基于河北区域制药企业生态工程[J].河北学刊,2015,35(1):142-145. 被引量:8
  • 2雷波.管碟法测定抗生素效价方法的优化研究[J].重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006,23(3):85-87. 被引量:5
  • 3国家环保总局.水和废水监测分析方法[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002..
  • 4LiZaixing(李再兴),TianBaokuo(田宝阔),ZuoJian’e(左剑恶),et al. Progress in treatment and disposaltechnology of antibiotic bacterial residues [J]. Environmental Engineering , 2012, 30 (2): 72-75.
  • 5制药工业污染防治技术政策[Z].2012.
  • 6Jianzheng Li,Ajay Kumar Jha,Tri Ratna Bajracharya.Dry Anaerobic Co-digestion of Cow Dung with Pig Manure for Methane Production[J]. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology . 2014 (6)
  • 7Si Jie Liu,Ran Zhou,Hong Kun Yue,Lan Xiang Shi.Optimization of Operation Parameters of Dry Anaerobic Co-Digestion from Animal Manure and Straw in a Batch Reactor[J]. Advanced Materials Research . 2014 (884)
  • 8V.N. Nkemka,M. Murto.Two-stage anaerobic dry digestion of blue mussel and reed[J]. Renewable Energy . 2013
  • 9Wang Z.-P.,Gulledge J.,Zheng J.-Q.,Liu W.,Li L.-H.,Han X.-G..Physical injury stimulates aerobic methane emissions from terrestrial plants[J]. Biogeosciences . 2009 (53)
  • 10S.M. Tiquia,N.F.Y. Tam.Elimination of phytotoxicity during co-composting of spent pig-manure sawdust litter and pig sludge[J]. Bioresource Technology . 1998 (1)

引证文献4

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部