期刊文献+

审计师惩戒与审计定价——基于中国证监会2008-2010年行政处罚案的研究 被引量:57

Auditor Sanction and Audit Pricing——Based on the data of listed clients of auditors disciplined by CSRC
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文利用中国证监会2008—2010年做出的关于会计师事务所的行政处罚决定,采用配对的方法,实证考察了审计师行政惩戒对审计定价的影响,结果发现,就受到证监会处罚的事务所而言,事务所在受处罚后,其审计收费显著高于受处罚前;与未受处罚事务所相比,受处罚事务所在受罚前后审计费用的提高幅度显著更高。进一步研究表明,审计师受处罚后,其客户操控性应计的绝对值确实显著下降。这表明,审计师在受处罚后可能会提高其努力程度以提高审计质量、重塑声誉,这将会提高审计成本并导致审计收费的相应提高。研究还发现,若上市公司客户所在地区法律环境好,则审计师受处罚后审计定价有显著提升,而在法律环境差的地区,审计师受处罚后审计定价并不会显著提高。 Using the data of listed clients of auditors disciplined by CSRC from 2008 to 2010 and their matched samples, this paper investigates the influence of auditor sanction on audit fee. The author finds a significant in- crease in audit fee and audit quality for the clients of auditors disciplined by CSRC following the sanctions. This finding demonstrates that auditors may increase their efforts to avoid future audit failure after the disciplinary actions and the reputation effects do play roles in China. Further analysis shows that audit fees would increase significantly only when legal institution is strong. So, the effect of auditor sanction on audit fee depends on legal environment.
作者 刘笑霞
机构地区 河海大学商学院
出处 《审计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期90-98,共9页 Auditing Research
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(项目批准号:11YJC790124) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(项目批准号:71072043 71272099) 江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究重点项目(项目批准号:2010ZDIXM025)的资助
关键词 行政惩戒 审计收费 审计努力 法律环境 sanction, audit fee, audit effort, legal environment
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1方军雄.转型经济中声誉机制有效性研究——来自中国审计市场的证据[J].财经研究,2011,37(12):16-26. 被引量:64
  • 2王兵,李晶,苏文兵,唐逸凡.行政处罚能改进审计质量吗?——基于中国证监会处罚的证据[J].会计研究,2011(12):86-92. 被引量:103
  • 3吴溪.监管处罚中的“重师轻所”及其后果:经验证据[J].会计研究,2008(8):23-31. 被引量:35
  • 4Choi, J. , J. Kim, X. Liu, and D. A. Simunic. 2008. Audit Pricing, Legal Liability Regimes, and Big 4 Premiums: Theory andCross-country Evidence [ J ]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25 (1) : 55-99.
  • 5Davis, Larry R. , and D. T. Simon. 1992. The Impact of SEC Disciplinary Actions on Audit Fees [J]. Auditing: A Journal of Prac- tice & Theory, 11 (1) : 58-68.
  • 6Eu-Jin, T. , and K. A. Houghton. 2001. Audit Litigation and the Pricing of Audit Services. American Accounting Association [ R]. Auditing Section Midyear Conference. Houston, Texas.
  • 7Firth, M. 1990. Auditor Reputation: The Impact of Critical Reports Issued by Government Inspectors [ J ]. Rand Journal of Econom- ics, 21 (3) : 374-387.
  • 8Firth, M. , P. L. L. MO, and Raymond M. K. Wong. 2004. Incentives for Auditor Independence: An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Formal Sanctions in China [ Z ]. Working paper, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
  • 9Wilson, Jr. , T. E. , and R. A. Grimlund. 1990. An Examination of the Importance of an Auditor's Reputation [J]. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 9(2) : 43-59.

二级参考文献52

共引文献157

同被引文献769

引证文献57

二级引证文献856

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部