期刊文献+

政治多元主义视角下的OECD国家公共养老金改革

下载PDF
导出
摘要 尽管OECD各成员国的公共养老金制度架构及历史不尽相同,但其改革的原因及改革的主流趋势却惊人地相似。目前OECD国家已经实施或者正引起广泛争论的改革方案分作两大类,即参数改革和范式改革,其中范式改革包括名义账户制和部分私有化改革。各类方案的特点反映出OECD国家公共养老金制度改革的一般趋势是改革而非革命。在政治多元主义视角下,OECD国家公共养老全制度的改革很少产生于政府的单方面立法过程,更常见的情形是通过党派协议、社会契约或全民公决的谈判形式解决养老金制度设计问题。
作者 梅丽萍
机构地区 中国人民大学
出处 《湖北行政学院学报》 2013年第2期77-82,共6页 Journal of Hubei Administration Institute
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Robert Holzmann, "Pension Policies in OECD Countries: Background, Trends and Implica- tions" .Journal of Public Policy, Vol. 9, No. 4 (Oct. - Dec., 1989).
  • 2OECD(2007), "pension at a glance:Public Policies across OECD countries", www.oecd.org/els/ pensionsystems/pensionsataglance2007.htm.
  • 3Sheetal K. Chand; AlbertJaeger, "Aging Populations and Public Pension Schemes". Interna- tional MonetaryFund: Occasionalpaper, no. 147. HD7105.3.C48,1996.
  • 4OECD(2006), "Live Longer, Work Longer". Paris, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  • 5OECD (2011), "pension at a glance 2011: Retirement-income Systems in OECD and G20 Coun- tries ". OECD Publishing.http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/ pension glance-2011-en.
  • 6Salvador Valdes-Prieto, "The Financial Sta- bility of Notional Account Pensions" .The Scandina- vian Journal of Economics, Vol. 102, No. 3, Social Security in the 21st Century (Jun., 2000).
  • 7Mattil, B.;Whitehouse, E., "Individual Deci- sions to Switch between Public and Private Pension Schemes" .Social, Employment and Migration Work- ing Paper, Paris, Organization for Economic Cooper- ation and Development.
  • 8艾斯平.安德森.福利资本主义的三个世界[M].郑秉文.北京:法律出版社,2003.
  • 9George Tsebelis, "Decision Making in Poli- tical Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parlia- mentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism". British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 25, No. 3 (Jul., 1995).
  • 10Ellen M. Immergut, "Institutions, Veto Points, and Policy Results: A Comparative Analysis of Health Care". Journal of Public Policy, Vol. 10, No. 4 (Oct. - Dec., 1990).

二级参考文献67

  • 1GILBERT N.TERRELL P.2003.社会福利政策导论[M].上海:华东理工大学出版社:72.
  • 2Scharpf, Fritz W. 1997. Gaznes Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder/Colorado: Westview Press.
  • 3Taylor-Gooby, Peter. (2005) UK Pension Reform: A Test Case For a Liberal Welfare State? in Giuliano Bonoli and Toshimitsu Shinkawa (eds). Ageing and Pension Reform A round the World-Evidence from Eleven Countries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • 4Taylor-Gooby, Peter, Trine Larsen and Johannes Kananen. 2004. Market Means and Welfare Ends: The UK Welfare State Experiment. Social Policy, 33(4).
  • 5Tsebelis, George. 1995. Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamnetarism, Multicamerialism and Multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science (25).
  • 6Vanderhei, Jim. and Juliet Eilperin. 2002. "Bush's Plan for Social Security Loses Favor." Washington Post (13).
  • 7Vanhuysse, Pieter. 2003. Divide and Pacify: The Political Economy of the Welfare State in Hungary and Poland, 1989-1996. London School of Economics (manuscript).
  • 8Ward, Sue. 2004. "Are the UK's Pension Objectives Attainable?" in Genard Hughes and Jim Stewart (eds). Reforming Pensions in Europe: Evolution of Pension Financing and Sources of Retirement Income. Cheltenham: Edwart Elgar.
  • 9World Bank. 1994. Averting the OM Age Crisis: Policies to Protect to the Old and Promote Growth. Washington DC: World Bank.
  • 10World Bank. 1995. Hungary -Structural Reform for Sustainable Growth. Washington DC : World Bank.

共引文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部