期刊文献+

规避遗产税的信托行为:否定抑或宽容——写在未来遗产税开征之前 被引量:10

Trust Behavior of the Avoidance of Inheritance Tax:Negating or Tolerating——Writing Before Future Levy of Inheritance Tax
原文传递
导出
摘要 我国尚未开征遗产税。近年来,学术界和实务界要求开征遗产税的呼声越来越高。随着民众财富的增加和贫富差距的加大,可以预见,我国将来定会出台遗产税。人具有趋利避害的属性,遗产税一旦开征,民众就会通过各种方式避免或减少缴纳遗产税。信托具有特殊的财产权利结构,在避税方面有着天然的功能和优势,因此通过设立信托规避遗产税可能较为普遍。对于这种规避行为,不能简单地给予否定评价。从信托的固有品格、"目的违法"认定的可操作性、国外的主流立场、我国民事信托不发达的现实、避税与逃税在本质上的差异等综合考虑,应对设立信托规避遗产税的行为宽容对待。 There is no inheritance tax in China at present. In recent years,the call for lev- ying inheritance tax in the academic circles and the practical realm are increasing. With the increase in public wealth and the gap between the rich and the poor, it forecasts that China will introduce inheritance tax. The individuals are featured by a disposition of seeking profits and avoiding losses; as soon as inheritance tax is levied, people will avoid paying or underpa- ying inheritance tax through a variety of ways. The trust has a special structure of property rights,and has natural function and advantage in terms of tax avoidance, so it may be more common to avoid inheritance tax by creating a trust. For this avoidance behavior, it is not proper to simply give a negative evaluation. Taking comprehensive account of factors such as inherent characteristics of the trust, the operability of the recognition of illegality by illegal purposes, foreign mainstream stance, underdeveloped reality of our civil trust, and the essen- tial difference between tax avoidance and tax evasion,we should treat tolerantly the behavior of tax avoidance through the establishment of trust.
作者 徐卫
出处 《上海财经大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期40-47,共8页 Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
基金 作者主持的2011年度中国法学会部级法学研究课题青年项目"遗嘱信托在我国信托法律制度中的构建研究"(项目号:CLS2011Y06)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 遗产税 规避 信托 信托法 inheritance tax avoidance trust trust law
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Patrick J. Lannon, Estate Planning Considerations for Out-of-State Property, The Florida Bar Journal, 2011, (85) ,p. 49.
  • 2刘晟.论税制改革与慈善事业的发展[J].湖北社会科学,2009(3):55-57. 被引量:4
  • 3Alyssaa DiRusso, American Nonprofit Law in Comparative Perspective,Washington University Global Stud- ies Law Review, 2011, (10), p. 83.
  • 4Nancy M. Annick,Plugging the "Gaping Loophole" of the Step-up in Basis at Death: A Proposal to Apply Carryover Basis to Excess Property, Pittsburgh Tax Review, 2011, (8), p. 85.
  • 5Christopher M. Reimer,International Trust Domestication.. Migrating an Offshore Trust to a U. S. Jurisdic- tion, The Quinnipiac Probate Law Journal, 2012, (25), p. 173.
  • 6Christopher M. Reimer, The Undiscovered Country: Wyoming's Emergence as a Leading Trust Situs Juris- diction,Wyoming Law Review,2011, (11) ,p. 197.
  • 7崔埈璿.《韩国信托法的改正》,王保树主编.《商事法论文集》(第19卷),法律出版社2011年版,第284页.
  • 8[日]能见善久.《现代信托法》,赵廉慧译,中国法制出版社2011年版,第79页.
  • 9[美]弗兰西恩.《动物权利导论》,张守东、刘耳译,中国政法大学出版社2005年版,第14页.
  • 10Reid Kress Weisbord,Wills For Everyone: Helping Individuals Opt Out of Intestacy, Boston College Law Review, 2012, (53), p. 938.

二级参考文献47

共引文献132

同被引文献51

  • 1杨帆,任明明.目前尚不宜征收遗产税分析[J].财政监督,2005(3):75-75. 被引量:2
  • 2叶姗.实质课税主义的理论价值确证[J].学术论坛,2006,29(2):113-117. 被引量:17
  • 3张天民.失去衡平法的信托[M].北京:中信出版社,2004.17—27.
  • 4RosenHS,郭庆旺.财政学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.
  • 5李雅琦.专访北京师范大学《遗产税制度对我国收入分配改革启示》课题负责人刘浩[N].东方早报,2013-3-12(C8).
  • 6秦炜.家族信托成转型趋势.信托、保险合作试水家族信托[N].证券日报,2014-05-30B01.
  • 7刘佳鹏.我国家族信托发展困境[J].法制博览,2016,06:164-165.
  • 8孙晨.家族信托的法律定位与法律困境[J].法制博览,2015,21:126-127+125.
  • 9Cowap, Charles. Why a trust can help protect your family and farm business[J]. Farmers Weekly, 2015,1647.
  • 10Perry John T.,Ring J. Kirk, Broberg J. Christian. Which Type of Advisors Do Family Businesses Trust Most? An Exploratory Application of Socioemotional Selectivity Theory[J]. Family Business Review, 2015, 283.

引证文献10

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部