期刊文献+

中医灌肠法与包醛氧淀粉治疗慢性肾功能衰竭的Meta分析 被引量:4

Meta Analysis of Treatment of Chronic Renal Failure between Traditional Chinese Medicine Enema Method and Oxyamyli Tectus Aldehydum
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:以循证医学系统评价方法 Meta分析为依据客观评价中医灌肠法治疗慢性肾功能衰竭的疗效及安全性。方法:以中国知网为主,检索国内各种,选择中医灌肠法与西医包醛氧淀粉治疗慢性肾功能衰竭的随机对照的试验研究。共纳入8篇符合纳入标准的随机对照临床试验并进行Meta分析。结果:与西医包醛氧淀粉组相比,中医灌肠法在治疗慢性肾功能衰竭在总体疗效,降低血肌酐、血尿素氮等方面优于西医治疗组。结论:灌肠法治疗慢性肾功能衰竭的疗效优于西医,但还需要设计良好的随机对照及多中心临床试验做进一步证实。 Objective: Using evidence-based Meta analysis to evaluate traditional Chinese medicine enema method in the treatment efficacyand safety of chronic renal failure. Method: Retrieval of domestic medical journals, choose Chinese medicine enema method with oxyamyli tectus aldehydum in the treatment of chronic renal failure randomized controlled experimental study. 8 randomized controlled clinical trials and Meta analysis. Result: Compared with oxyamyli tectus aldehydum, enema method in the treatment of chronic renal failure in overall efficacy, lower serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, are superior to that of oxyamyli tectus aldehydum group. Conclusion: Enema method in treating chronic renal failure of the superior efficacy of oxyamyli tectus aldehydum, but also needs to be well designed randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial and further confirmed.
出处 《中国实验方剂学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第7期354-358,共5页 Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae
基金 宁夏自然科学基金项目(NZ09104) 宁夏医科大学博士课题启动项目(XT200808)
关键词 循证医学 中医灌肠法 META分析 evidence-based medicine enema method Meta analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献68

共引文献745

同被引文献57

  • 1魏理.尿毒清颗粒辅助治疗慢性肾功能衰竭疗效的系统评价[J].甘肃中医,2007,20(6):28-30. 被引量:8
  • 2王利军,郭岚,刘冰,等..肾衰竭[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2011.
  • 3Marra G, Silva Y M, Edefonti A C, et al. Comparison of the epidemiology of chronic renal failure (CRF) in low and high-income countries [J]. Clin Nephrol, 2010, 74: S157.
  • 4Terry Feest. Epidemiology and causes of chronic renal failure [J]. Medicine, 2007, 35(8): 438-441.
  • 5Hayata M, Kakizoe Y, Uchimura K, et al. Effect of a serine protease inhibitor on the progression of chronic renal failure [J]. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 2012, 303(8): 1126-1135.
  • 6Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2009, 62(10): 1006-1012.
  • 7Shea B J, Grimshaw J M, Wells G A, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews [J]. BMC MedRes Methodol, 2007, 7: 10.
  • 8GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations [J]. BMJ, 2004, 328(7454): 1490.
  • 9李玫.大黄治疗慢性肾功能衰竭的系统评价[D].成都:四川大学,2001.
  • 10罗杰,冷卫东.系统评价/Meta分析理论与实践[M].北京:军事医学科学出版社,2013.

引证文献4

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部