期刊文献+

无领导小组讨论的评分者效应分析 被引量:2

A Research on Rater Effects of Leaderless Group Discussion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以大学生为研究对象,实施无领导小组讨论测评,探讨培训组与非培训组评分者的信效度差异。通过相关分析、验证性因素分析等方法检验评分者的内部一致性、评分者间信度、组间与组内差异、结构效度及效标关联效度。结果显示,培训效应对评分者影响显著,经培训与未经培训的评分者组间差异显著,培训组评分结果的效标关联效度优于非培训组。对评分者进行系统的培训能有效促进客观公正地实施测评,提高测评结果准确性。 With university students as subjects, this paper carried out a Leaderless Group Discussion Test and probed into differences of raters' validity in Training group and non - training group in LGD Test. Through correlation analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, it tested internal consistency, inter - rater reliability, differences between groups, group differences, construct validity and criterion - related validity. The results illustrate that training of raters has significant effects on scores of LGD tests. There are obvious differences between groups among trained and untrained raters; the criterion - related validity of Training group rating is better than that of non - training group. The results show that raters' systematic training will ensure more objective and impartial implementation in LGD Test and improve the rating accuracy.
出处 《广州大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2013年第2期60-65,共6页 Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition
基金 广东省哲学社会科学"十一五"计划2010年课题(GD10CGL08)
关键词 无领导小组讨论测评 评分者内部一致性 评分者间信度 评分者效应 效标关联效度 Leaderless Group Discussion Test inter-rater consistency rater effect construct validity criteri- on-related validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Bass BM. Leaderless group discussion[J]. Psychological Bulletin. 1954(51) :465 -492.
  • 2Bray DW, Grant DL. The assessment center in the meas- urement of potential for business management [ J ]. Psy- chological Monograph. 1966,80(17) : 1 - 27.
  • 3JM Greenwood, WJ McNamara. Interrater reliability in situational tests [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1967,51(2) :101 - 106.
  • 4R Clingenpell. Validity and dynamics of a foreman selec- tion process [ C ]. Meeting of the Seventh Interneational Congress on the psychosocial aspects. 1979.
  • 5R Gatewood, GC Thornton, HW Hennessey. Reliability of exercise ratings in the leaderless group discussion [ J ]. Journal of Occupational Psychology. 1990,63 (4) - 331 - 342.
  • 6Craik KH, Ware AP, Kamp J, et al. Explorations of con- struct validity in a combined managerial and personality assessment programme [ J ]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology ,2002,75 : 171 - 193.
  • 7关培兰,苏永华.“无领导小组讨论法”在人员招聘中的应用研究[J].武汉大学学报(人文科学版),1999,53(2):33-36. 被引量:14
  • 8吴谅谅,何琪.“无领导小组讨论”的应用[J].中国人力资源开发,2001,18(7):33-35. 被引量:6
  • 9吴志明,张厚粲.评价中心的构想效度和结构模型[J].心理学报,2001,33(4):372-378. 被引量:37
  • 10彭平根,丁彪,苏永华.LGD在选拔企业中高级管理人才方面的实证研究[J].心理科学,2002,25(5):576-579. 被引量:15

二级参考文献36

  • 1王重鸣,陈民科.管理胜任力特征分析:结构方程模型检验[J].心理科学,2002,25(5):513-516. 被引量:507
  • 2吴志明,张厚粲.评价中心的构想效度和结构模型[J].心理学报,2001,33(4):372-378. 被引量:37
  • 3吴红岩,李文东,谢义忠,时勘.图书编辑胜任特征模型的评价研究[J].人类工效学,2006,12(1):17-19. 被引量:11
  • 4赵立军.基于人格特征的管理人员胜任力模型初探[J].聊城大学学报(自然科学版),2006,19(1):108-110. 被引量:10
  • 5Spencer LM, Spencer S M. Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance (M3 . New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. , 1993.
  • 6Boyatzis R E. The competent manager: A model for effective Performance [M] . New York: Wiley, 1982.
  • 7Lyle M. Spencer, Jr., Signe M. Spencer.才能评鉴法:建立卓越绩效的模式[M].魏梅金,译.台北:商周出版,2002.
  • 8Kyoo Yup Chung. Hotel management curriculum reform based on required competencies of hotel employees and career success in the hotel industry [J] . Tourism Management, 2000 (21): 437-487.
  • 9Vickie Siu. Managing by competencies--a study on the managerial competencies of hotel middle managers in Hong Kong [J] . Hospital management, 1998 (17): 253-273.
  • 10Linn, R. L., & Burton, E. Performance-based assessment:Implications of task specificity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1994,11(1):3-9,20.

共引文献115

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部