期刊文献+

延迟关键词效应对化学解题中元理解监测精确性的影响

下载PDF
导出
摘要 问题的解决遍布生活的每个角落,学习者解决化学问题理所当然也包括其中。问题解决的过程主要是一种元理解监测的能力,是属于元认知范畴,是教育心理学的重要组成部分。元理解监测是主观见之于客观的活动,是指学习者解决问题和对问题完成后的结果进行判断的过程,学习者的这种能力叫元理解监测,这种元理解监测与标准测试之间的一致程度,我们称为“元理解监测的精确性”[1]。从认知心理学的角度出发,采用实验的方法讨论研究学生在化学解题过程中元理解监测精确性的高低对解题的影响,以及和“元理解监测的延迟关键词效应”的关系,探讨了中等生在延迟关键词的作用下,如何提高学生在解决化学问题中的学习判断,使得元理解监测得到有效地提高。
作者 黄亮 裴波
机构地区 哈尔滨师范大学
出处 《林区教学》 2013年第3期3-5,共3页 Teaching of Forestry Region
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1陈启山.元理解监测精确性的延迟效应及其机制[J].心理科学,2011,34(4):828-833. 被引量:5
  • 2皮连生.教育心理学[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2009.
  • 3赵晶,李荔波.理解监测及其准确性[J].浙江教育学院学报,2010(1):44-47. 被引量:1
  • 4Thiede K W, Anderson M C M, Therriault D. Accuracy of metaeognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Jour- nal of Educational Psychology, 2003,95 ( 1 ) : 66 - 73.
  • 5Thiede K W, Anderson M C M. Summarizing can im- provemetacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educa- tionalPsychology ,2003,28 (2) : 129 - 160.
  • 6邱烁,张振新.元理解监测精确性与自我解释[J].发展与教育心理学,2001,(4).
  • 7Goodman L A, Kruskal W H. Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistica Associations, 1954, (49) :732 - 764.
  • 8Fletcher C R, van den Broek P, Arthur E J. A model of narrative comprehension and recall. In B K Britton, A C Graesser ( Eds. ), Models of understanding text. Mah- wah, NJ:Erlbaum,1996:141 -164.
  • 9Rapp D N, van den Broek P. Dynamic text comprehension: An integrative view of reading. Current Directions in Psychological Sci- ence ,2005,14(5 ) :276 - 279.
  • 10Thiede K W, Dunlosky J, Griffin T D, Wiley J. Under- standing the delayed - keyword effect on metaeomprehens- ion accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learn- ing, Memory, and Cognition,2005,31 (6) : 1267 - 1280.

二级参考文献19

  • 1刘希平,方格,杨小冬.方格[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(4):524-535. 被引量:15
  • 2贾宁,白学军,沈德立.学习判断准确性的研究方法[J].心理发展与教育,2006,22(3):103-109. 被引量:23
  • 3陈启山.元理解监控的精确性及其延迟关键词效应[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(2):295-300. 被引量:9
  • 4Anderson, M. C. M., & Thiede, K. W. (2008). Why do delayed summaries improve metacomprehension accuracy? Acta Psychologica, 128, 110-118.
  • 5Butler, D. L., & Wirme, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self- regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245 - 281.
  • 6Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. (2007). Metacornprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 228 - 232.
  • 7Dunlosky, J., & Connor, L. T. (1997). Age differences in the allocation of study time account for age differences in memory performance. Memory Cognition, 25, 691 - 700.
  • 8Hasselhom, M., & Hager, W. (1989). Prediction accuracy and memory performance: Correlational and experimental tests of a metamemory hypothesis. Psychological Research, 51,147 - 152.
  • 9Kelemen, W. L. (2000). Metamemory cues and monitoring accuracy: Judging what you know and what you will know. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 800 - 810.
  • 10Maki, R. H. (1998). Predicting performance on text: Delayed versus immediate predictions and tests. Memory & Cognition, 26, 959 - 964.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部