期刊文献+

腹腔镜-阴道骶骨固定术后性生活质量的评价 被引量:1

Quality of sexual activity following larparoscopic sacrocolcopexy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹腔镜阴道-骶骨固定术对中-重度盆腔器官脱垂(POP)患者术后性生活质量的影响。方法:回顾性分析2008年1月至2011年3月因中-重度POP行腹腔镜阴道-骶骨固定术的40例患者的临床资料,采用盆底器官脱垂/尿失禁对性功能影响问卷简表12(PISQ-12)评估患者术前及术后性生活质量情况,采用PGI-I问卷评估患者对手术的整体满意度。结果:40例患者术前和术后PISQ-12评分分别为(29.6±10.5)、(36.0±0.6)分,两者比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。38例(95%)患者对手术效果感到非常满意;2例(5%)较为满意。结论:腹腔镜阴道-骶骨固定术可改善中-重度POP患者术后性生活质量,提高手术满意度,但远期疗效有待进一步随访研究。 Objective:To determine the quality of sexual activity in women who had severe pelvic organ prolapse (POP) following laparoscopic saeroeolpopexy (LSC). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical profiles of 40 women with severe POP who underwent LSC between January 2008 and March 2011. The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12) was employed to assess the patients' sexual aeitivty prior to and following LSC, and Patients' s Global Impression of Improvement ( PGI- I) was applied to determine the overall satisfaction to LSC. Results: LSC resulted in a marked reduction in PISQ- 12 score ( [ 29.6 ± 10.5 ] vs. [ 36. 0±0. 6 ], P 〈 0.01 ). 38 patients (95%) showed considerable satisfaction and 2 (5%) responded satisfactorily. Conclusion: LSC may improve the quality of sexual activity and satisfaction postoperatively in women with severe POP yet requires further investigation with regard to the long- term efficacy.
出处 《广州医学院学报》 2012年第6期69-71,共3页 Academic Journal of Guangzhou Medical College
基金 广东省医学科学技术基金(A2009263)
关键词 阴道-骶骨固定术 腹腔镜检查 盆底器官脱垂 性生活质量 laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy larparoscopic examination pelvic organ prolapse quality of sexual activity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Olsen AL, Smith V J, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence [ J ] . Obstet Gynecol, 1997, 89 (4) : 501- 506.
  • 2Stanton SL, Kerr-Wilson R, Harris VG. The incidence of urological symptoms in normal pregnancy[J] . Br J ObstetGynaecol, 1980, 87 (10) : 897-900.
  • 3Subak LL, Waetjen LE, van den Eeden S, et al. Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States [ J ] . Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 98(4):646-651.
  • 4Withagen MI, Milani AL, den Boon J, et al. Trocar- guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial [ J ]. Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 117(2 Pt 1) : 242-250.
  • 5Moen MD. Surgery for urogenital prolapse [ J ] . Rev Med Univ Navarra, 2004, 48(4) :50-55.
  • 6Roger RG,Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, et al. A short form of the pelvic organ prolapse. /Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) [ J] . Int Urogyneeol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 2003, 14 (3) : 164-168.
  • 7Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapsed [ J . Int Urogynecol J, 2010, 21 ( 5 ) : 523 -528.
  • 8Tate SB, Blackwell L, Lorenz DJ, et al. Randomized trial of fascia lata and polypropylene mesh for abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 5-year follow-up [ J ] . Int Urogynecol J, 2011, 22(2) : 137-143.
  • 9Elmer C, Ahman D, Engh ME, et al. Trocar-guided transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse [ J ]. Obstet Gynecol,2009, 113 ( 1 ) : 117-126.

同被引文献14

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部