期刊文献+

质子泵抑制剂与安慰剂对喉咽反流患者喉部体征的疗效比较——Meta分析 被引量:2

Comparison between proton pump inhibitor and placebo in improving laryngeal signs of laryngopharyngeal reflux patients ——a Meta analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过Meta分析评价质子泵抑制剂(PPI)在改善喉咽反流(LPR)患者的喉部体征方面是否优于安慰剂。方法收集已发表和未发表的有关比较PPI和安慰剂对LPR治疗的随机对照临床研究,对检索到的原始研究的质量进行评估,对符合条件的所有研究结果进行分析。结果共纳入7篇文献,总样本量417例,其中PPI组233例,安慰剂组184例。标准均数差(SMD)为0.53,95%可信区间为(-0.44,1.50),P=0.28。纳入文献中有4篇提供了PPIvs安慰剂治疗12周的数据,SMD为1.12,95%可信区间(-1.54,3.78),P=0.41。结论尚缺乏证据表明PPI治疗在改善LPR患者的喉部体征方面优于安慰剂。 Objective To compare the roles of proton pump inhibitor(PPI) and placebo in the improvement of laryngeal signs of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). Methods Published and unpublished articles which compare the therapeutic outcomes of LPR using PPI and placebo in randomized controlled clinical trials were collected. The quality of the searched original studies were assessed and the outcomes which are in line with the requirements were analyzed. Results Seven articles met the inclusion criteria, which contained 417 cases in total. There were 233 cases in the PPI group and 184 cases in the placebo group. The standardized mean differences (SMD) was 0.53 with a 95% confidence interval (-O. 44,1.50), P = 0.28. The data of PPI vs placebo therapy for 12 weeks were provided in 4 articles. The SMD was 1.12 with a 95% confidence interval ( -1.54, 3.78 ), P = 0.41. Conclusions There was no significant evidence to prove a superior role of PPI compared to the placebo in improving laryngeal signs of LPR patients.
出处 《中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志》 2013年第2期119-122,共4页 Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology
关键词 喉咽反流 质子泵抑制剂 META分析 Laryngopharyngeal reflux Proton pump inhibitor Meta analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Groome M, Cotton JP, Borland M, et al. Prevalence of lmyngopharyngeal reflux in a population with gastroesophageal reflux [ J ]. Laryngoscope,2007, 117 (8) : 1424-1428.
  • 2Koufman JA, Aviv JE, Casiano RR, et al. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: position statement of the committee on speech, voice, and swallowing disorders of the American Academy of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery [ J ]. OtoaryngoI Head Neck Surg, 2002, 127(1) : 32-35.
  • 3Siupsinskiene N, Adamonis K, Toohill RJ. Quality of life in laryngo- pharyngeal reflux patients [ J ]. Laryngoscope, 2007, 117 ( 3 ) : 480-484.
  • 4Qadeer MA, Phillips CO, Lopez AR, et al. Proton pump inhibitor therapy for suspected GERD-related ehronie laryngitis: a meta- analysis of randomized controlled trials [ J ]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2006,101 ( 11 ) :2646-2654.
  • 5Dumper J, Mechor B, Chan J, et al. Lansoprazole in glohus pharyngeus : Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial [ J]. J Otolaryngol Head Neek Surg, 2008, 37 (5) : 657-663.
  • 6Fass R, Noelek N, Willis MR, et al. The effect of esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily on acoustic and perception parameters of the voice in laryngopharyngeal reflux [ J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2010, 22 (2) :134-141.
  • 7EI-Serag HB, Lee P, Buchner A, et al. Lansoprazole treatment of patients with chronic idiopathic laryngitis: a placebo-controlled trial [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2001, 96(4) :979-983.
  • 8Reichel O, Dressel H, Wiedernders K, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with esomeprazole for symptoms and signs associated with laryngopharyngeal reflux[ J. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2008, 139(3) :414-420.
  • 9Lain PK, Ng ML, Cheung TK, et al. Rabeprazole is effective in treating laryngopharyngeal reflux in a randomized placebo-controlled trial[ J ]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepato1,2010,8 ( 9 ) :770-776.
  • 10Wo JM, Koopman J, Harrell SP, et al. Double-blind, placebo- controlled trial with single-dose pantoprazole for laryngopharyngeal reflux J ]. Am J Gastroentero1,2006,101 (9) : 1972-1978.

同被引文献22

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部