期刊文献+

地铁运行引起室内二次辐射噪声烦恼度阈值分析 被引量:6

Analysis on Annoying Threshold of Subway Induced Ground-borne Noise in Buildings
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对临近地铁居民现场问卷调查及住宅内进行的室内二次辐射噪声实测结果统计,分析了不同因素对地铁引起室内二次辐射噪声对居民生活的影响。探讨了在不同噪声评价量下,地铁引起室内二次辐射噪声的声压级随楼层及距离的衰减。根据室内噪声的实测结果与居民对室内噪声的烦恼度反应,计算了现行标准中室内噪声的不同评价量的烦恼度阈值,为今后更加深入和全面地研究地铁引起的二次辐射噪声烦恼度及其评价标准问题提供了基础资料。 Through statistical analyses on questionnaire and in-situ measure results of ground-borne noise in buildings caused by subway,effects on living condition of inhabitants under different factors were studied. Attenuation between sound pressure level of ground-borne noise and floor and distance from the tunnel center line was discussed. Based on measurement results and reaction of annoyance for inhabitant to ground-borne noise, the annoying threshold to different assessment value in current standard of ground-borne noise were calculated. It is the basis for ground-borne noise annoyance research and its evaluation criterion.
出处 《结构工程师》 北大核心 2013年第1期40-46,共7页 Structural Engineers
关键词 地铁 二次辐射噪声 评价量 问卷调查 烦恼度阈值 subway ground-borne noise assessment value questionnaire annoying threshold
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1E. Ohrstrom, Lars Barregard, Eva Andersson, et al. Annoyance due to single and combined sound expo- sure from railway and road traffic [ J ]. Acoustical So-ciety of America, 2007, 122 ( 5 ) : 2642-2652.
  • 2周灿平,何翀,姜在秀.城市轨道交通噪声评价方法及其限值的研究[J].中国环境监测,2009,25(4):91-94. 被引量:6
  • 3Yano T, Yamashita T, Izumi K. Comparison of com- munity annoyance from railway noise evaluated by dif- ferent category scales [ J ]. Journal of Sound and Vi-bration, 1997, 205(4) : 505-511.
  • 4Vadillo E G, Herreros J, Walker J G. Subjective re- action to structurally radiation sound from underground railways : field resuhs [ J ]. Journal of Sound and Vi- bration,1996,193( 1 ) : 65-74.
  • 5Aasvang G M, Engdahl B, Rothschild K. Annoyance and self-reported sleep disturbances due to structurally radiated noise from railway tunnels [ J ]. Applied A- coustics, 2007, 68:970 981.
  • 6Walker J G, Chan M K F. Human response to struc- turally radiated noise due to underground railway oper- ations [ J ]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1996,193 (1): 49-63.
  • 7Schultz T J. Synthesis of social surveys on noise an- noyance [ J]. Acoustical Society of America, 1978, 64 ( 2 ) : 557-405.
  • 8Henk M E M, Henk V. Exposure-response relation- ships for transportation noise [ J ]. Acoustical Society of America, 1998, 104(6) : 3432-3445.
  • 9Levinen N. The development of an annoyance scale for community noise assessment[ J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1981, 74(2) : 265-279.
  • 10FTA (2006). Transit noise and vibration impact as- sessment. Office of Planning and Environment, Fed- eral Transit Administration [ R ]. Report Number: FTA-VA-90 -1003 -06.

二级参考文献25

  • 1潘仲麟,黄有兴,金进生,张邦俊,胡伟,纪伟昌.公园环境噪声的主观反应及烦恼度阈值[J].声学学报,1993,18(6):463-467. 被引量:13
  • 2俞鹏,翟国庆,黄逸凡,张邦俊.城市居住区设备噪声频率特性分析[J].中国环境科学,2006,26(4):491-495. 被引量:36
  • 3J. KAKU, I. YAMADA. The possibility of a bonus for evaluation railway noise in Japan[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1996,193( 1 ) :445 - 450.
  • 4Office of planning and environment, Federal Transit Administration, U. S. Department of Transportation. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. Washington, DC.2006.5.
  • 5JISE4025:2001铁道车辆の车外骚音-试验方法[S].
  • 6ISO 3095 - 2005 Railway application--Acoustics-- Measurement of noise emitted by railbound vehicles[S].
  • 7J. KAKU, I. YAMADA. The possibility of a bonus for evaluationg railway noise in Japan [ J ]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1996,193 ( 1 ) : 445 - 450.
  • 8王家柱 何存道等.城市环境噪声主观评价的调查研究.华东师范大学学报:自然科学版,1983,(1):105-112.
  • 9Bengtsson J, Persson Waye K, KjeUberg A. Evaluations of effects due to low-frequency noise in a low demanding work situation [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2004,278:83-99.
  • 10Persson Waye K. Effects of low frequency noise on sleep [J]. Noise and Health, 2004,6(23):87-91.

共引文献12

同被引文献34

引证文献6

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部