我国身份盗窃的刑法规制研究——兼与美国身份盗窃刑法规制的比较

On the Criminal Regulation about Identity Theft in China——And the Comparative Analysis with the United States' Criminal regulation about Identity Theft

身份盗窃具有严重的法益侵害性,应当运用刑法予以规制。但是我国现行刑法并没有为其设置专门罪名,而是通过对其预备行为与后续行为的禁止来实现对身份盗窃的间接规制。并且相关规范在行为的内容、主体、对象以及主观方面等要素的规定上存在严重的不足,无法满足规制的需要。而美国联邦及所属州和地区却通过不同模式的制定法为我们展现了运用刑法对身份盗窃进行直接规制的可能。这些模式大致分为两类,两类模式各有优劣。本文在比较分析的基础上,探索分析了我国完善身份盗窃刑法规制的途径与措施。

The identity theft violates law profit so heavily that it should be regulated by criminal law.The current criminal law in China hasn＇t set an independent crime but to regulate it by publishing its preparation or intention behaviors.Moreover, among those regulations,there＇re many flaws in the aspects of subjects ,objects and other contents of behaviors. On the contrary ,the legislations of Federal and 49 states and regions in the United States present us the probability of direct regulating about identity theft in criminal law,which can be divided into two forms.Those two forms legislations have their merits and flaws by each.On the basis of compara- tive analysis,the papers will analysis the way of perfecting criminal regulations about identity theft.