期刊文献+

血清HE4与CA125联合检测在盆腔包块患者恶性卵巢癌风险评估中的应用价值 被引量:8

Significance of combined detection of HE4 and CA125 in risk assessment of patients with pelvic mass with malignant ovarian cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的本研究应用血清人附睾蛋白4(HE4)与糖类蛋白125(CA125)联合检测并结合卵巢癌恶性风险模型(ROMA法则)对拟行手术的盆腔包块患者进行卵巢癌恶性风险评估,并探讨其应用价值。方法收集盆腔包块拟行手术患者196例血清(包括术前、术后),按术后病理诊断结果分为卵巢癌组和卵巢良性疾病组,并收集120例女性健康对照组血清,采用全自动化学发光微粒子免疫分析方法测定HE4和CA125水平并计算ROMA风险值。结果卵巢癌组血清HE4、CA125水平[分别为(227.46±375.68)pmol/L和(477.22±929.90)U/mL]与卵巢良性疾病组[(37.37±9.23)pmol/L和(51.04±61.06)U/mL]和健康对照组[分别为(35.75±9.71)pmol/L和(11.61±5.77)U/mL]比较,均呈显著升高(P<0.05);将75%的卵巢良性疾病分类为低风险所对应的ROMA值确定为判断标准,其中未绝经患者ROMA≥5.6%归为患上皮性卵巢癌的高风险性。而绝经患者RO-MA≥17.5%归为患上皮性卵巢癌的高风险性。按上述标准风险评估特异度75%,总的灵敏度为58.5%,阳性预测值为67.9%,阴性预测值为66.1%。结论联合检测盆腔包块患者血清HE4和CA125浓度并采用ROMA法则在评估患者恶性卵巢癌风险中具有一定的应用价值,为临床上卵巢癌的早发现、早诊治以及提高卵巢癌患者的预后水平提供了新的思路。 Objective To investigate the value of combined detection of serum HE4and CA125and the ROMA method used to assess the risk of malignant ovarian cancer in patients with pelvic mass.Methods The serum of 196patients with pelvic mass were collected(before and after operation).According to the result of pathology diagosis after operation,all patients were divided into ovarian cancer group(94patients),benign ovarian disease group(102patients)and 120healthy controls.Serum HE4and CA125 were assayed by automatic chemical microparticle Immunoassay.The value of ROMA was calculated.Results Serum HE4and CA125level of ovarian cancer patients[(227.46±375.68pmol/L)and(477.22±929.90)U/mL]were significantly higher than the healthy controls[(35.75±9.71)pmol/L and(11.61±5.77)U/mL]and ovarian benign disease group[(37.37±9.23)pmol/L and(51.04±61.06)U/mL](P0.05).ROMA value is determined as 75%of benign ovarian disease classified as low-risk,if ROMA value≥5.6%there was high risk of epithelial ovarian cancer for pre-menopausal patients and≥17.5%for post-menopausal patients respectively.The specificity,sensitivity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of risk assessment were 75 %,58.5%,67.9%and 66.1%respectively,according to the above criteria.Conclusion Combined detection of serum HE4and CA125and the use of ROMA rule is suitable to assess the risk of malignant ovarian cancer in patients with pelvic mass and provides a new way for early detection and diagnosis of ovarian cancer and to improve the prognosis of ovarian cancer patients.
出处 《国际检验医学杂志》 CAS 2013年第5期543-544,547,共3页 International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
关键词 卵巢肿瘤 CA125抗原 人附睾蛋白4 卵巢恶性肿瘤风险模型 ovarian neoplasms CA125antigen human epididymal protein 4 risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Ho SM. Estrogen, Progesterone and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer [J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2003,1 (1) .- 73.
  • 2Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012 [J]. CA Cancer J C1in,2004,62(1) 10-29.
  • 3Schink JC. Current initial therapy of stage III and IV ovarian Cancerchallenges for managed care[J]. Semin Oncol, 1999, 26 (Suppl 1).-$2 7.
  • 4Strigini FA,Gadducci A, Dei Bravo B, et al. Differential diagnosis of adnexal masses with transvaginal sonography, color flow ima- ging,and serum CA 125 assay in pre- and postmenopausal women [J]. Gynecol Onco1,1996,61(1) :68-72.
  • 5Kobayashi H, Yamada YI Sado T, et al. A randomized study of screening for ovarian Cancer a multicenter study in Japan[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2008,18(3) 414-420.
  • 6Bast RC Jr. Status of tumor markers in ovarian cancer screening[J]. J Clin 0ncol,2003,21(SuppI 10) :$200-205.
  • 7Drapkin R, von Horsten H H, Lin Y, et al. Human epididymis pro- tein 4 (HE4) is a secreted glycoprotein that is overexpressed by serous and endometrioid ovarian carcinomas [J]. Cancer Res, 2005,65(6) : 2162-2169.
  • 8Moore RG, Mcmeekin DS, Brown AK, et al. A novel multiple marker bioassay utilizing HE4 and CA125 for the prediction of o- varian Cancer in patients with a pelvic mass[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2009,112(1) 40-46.
  • 9Hellstrom I, Raycrat J, Hayden-Ledbetter M, et al. The HE4 (WFDC2) protein is a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma[J]. Canc er Res, 2003,63(13) 3695-3700.
  • 10Rosenthal A,Jacobs I. Ovarian cancer screening [J]- Semin On co1,1998,25(3) :315-325.

同被引文献94

  • 1Moore RG, Mc Meekin DS, Brown AK, et al. A novel multiple marker bioassay utilizing HE4 and CA 125 for the prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass [ J ]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2009,112 (1) :40 -46.
  • 2Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary [ J ]. Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996,17 ( 1 ) : 1 - 12.
  • 3Moore RG, Jabre-Raughley M, Brown AK, et al. Comparison of a novel multiple marker assay vs the risk of malignancy Index for the predic- tion of epithelial ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass[J]. Am Jobstet Gyneco1,2010,203 ( 3 ) :228. e1 - e6.
  • 4Jacob F, Meier M, Caduff R, et al. No benefit from combining HE4 and CA 125 as ovarian tumor markers in a clinical setting[ J]. Gynecol On- col,2011,121 (3) :487 -491.
  • 5Stiekema A, I_ok CAR, Kenter GG, et al. A predictive model combining human epididymal protein 4 and radiologic features for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer[ J ]. Gynecol Onco1,2014,132 (3) :573 - 577.
  • 6Karlsen MA, Sandhu N, Hcgdall C, et al. Evaluation of HE4, CA 125, risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm(ROMA) and risk of malignancy index(RMI) as diagnostic tools of epithelial ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass[J]. Gynecol Oncol,2012,127(2) :379 -383.
  • 7Bandiera E, Romani C, Specchia C, et al. Serum human epididymis protein 4 and risk for ovarian malignancy algorithm as new diagnostic and prognostic tools for epithelial ovarian cancer management [ J ]. Cancer Epidem Biomar,2011,20 ( 12 ) :2496 - 2506.
  • 8Moore RG, Miller MC, Disilvestro P, et al. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm in women with a pelvic mass [ J ]. Obstet Gyneco1,2011,118 (2 Pt 1 ) :280 - 288.
  • 9Molina R, Escudero JM, Aug6 JM, et al. HE4 a novel tumor marker for ovarian cancer: comparison with CAl25 and ROMA algorithm in pa- tients with gynecological diseases [ J ]. Tumor Biol, 2011,32 ( 6 ) : 1087 - 1095.
  • 10Egger M, Smith DG, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [ J ]. BMJ, 1997,315 (7109 ) :629 - 634.

引证文献8

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部