两种盖髓材料用于103颗牙盖髓术治疗的效果观察

Effective observation on two kinds of pulp capping agent used in 103 teeth for pulp capping treatment

目的比较可乐丽菲露SE3 BOND牙本质粘接剂和Dycal氢氧化钙的临床效果。方法选择2007年7月至2009年7月本院收治的直接或间接盖髓术的患者95例103颗牙,按使用材料分为两组,采用可乐丽菲露SE3 BOND牙本质粘接剂盖髓术患牙49颗为SE3 BOND组,采用Dycal氢氧化钙盖髓术患牙54颗为Dycal组,比较两种盖髓剂在术后追踪观察6、12个月的疗效。结果 Dycal组6、12个月直接盖髓术成功率均高于SE3 BOND组(P<0.05),Dycal和SE3 BOND材料应用于间接盖髓术成功率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 SE3 BOND和Dycal材料用于间接盖髓术疗效均佳,Dycal材料用于直接盖髓术疗效更好。

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of capping technique SE3 BOND（SB） and Dycal.Methods 95 cases（103 teeth） of direct or indirect pulp capping in this hospital from July 2007 to July 2009 were selected and divided into two groups according to the used materials.49 teeth were treated with SB and 54 teeth with Dycal for pulp capping.The curative effects during postoperative 6-12 months were followed up.Results The success rates of direct pulp-capping in 6,12 months in the Dycal group were obviously higher than those in the SB group,the difference showing statistical significance（P0.05）.But the success rates of indirect pulp-capping used in the Dycal and SB groups had no statistical difference（P0.05）.Conclusion SB and Dycal are both effective pulp capping agents in the indirect pulp capping for deep-caries,while Dycal has better effect in the direct pulp capping.