期刊文献+

硬膜外预充液对腰硬联合阻滞剖宫产术患者硬膜外置管血管损伤及腰麻效果的影响 被引量:3

Effects of Fluid Preloading before Epidural Analgesia Combined with Lumbar Epidural Block for Cesarean Section on Epidural Catheterization-induced Vascular Injury and Lumbar Anesthesia Efficacy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察硬膜外预充液预防剖宫产术患者硬膜外导管致硬膜外血管损伤及腰麻效果的影响。方法将180例单胎足月妊娠拟在腰硬联合麻醉下行剖宫产术的产妇,按随机数字表法分为3组,每组60例。3组产妇均取左侧卧位,L2-3椎间隙行腰硬联合穿刺。硬膜外穿刺成功后将脊麻针穿过硬膜外针内腔行蛛网膜下隙穿刺,见脑脊液回流后,注入0.75%左布比卡因2.0 mL,拔出腰麻针。Ⅰ组产妇硬膜外置管前在硬膜外腔注入生理盐水5 mL;Ⅱ组产妇硬膜外置管前在硬膜外腔注入含麻黄素15 mg的生理盐水5 mL;Ⅲ组产妇硬膜外腔直接置入导管。记录3组产妇血管损伤发生率,观察麻醉注药前(T0),经穿刺针注药液后2 min(T1),5 min(T2)HR、SBP、DBP的变化,以及采用针刺法测定注药后5、10 min时的感觉阻滞平面。结果Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ组血管损伤发生率分别为3.3%、1.6%及13.3%,Ⅲ组血管损伤发生率明显高于Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组(均P<0.05),Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3组产妇T1及T2的SBP较T0有明显的下降(均P<0.05),3组间比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。Ⅰ、Ⅱ组感觉阻滞平面较Ⅲ组明显升高(P<0.05),Ⅰ、Ⅱ组注药后感觉阻滞平面比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腰硬联合麻醉剖宫产产妇在硬膜外预充少许液体,可以预防硬膜外导管置入时损伤血管,提高剖宫产产妇腰硬联合阻滞麻醉的安全性,同时还可改善腰麻的效果。 Objective To observe the effects of fluid preloading before epidural analgesia combined with lumbar epidural block for cesarean section on epidural catheterization-induced vascular injury and lumbar anesthesia efficacy.Methods One hundred and eighty parturients with single fetus full-term pregnancy who were scheduled for cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were randomly divided into three groups,with 60 parturients in each group.Lumbar epidural puncture was performed at L2-3 lumbar interspace in all parturients in the left lateral position.Spinal needle was inserted through the lumen of the epidural needle for subarachnoid puncture and 0.75% levobupivacaine(2 mL)was injected after backflow of cerebrospinal fluid.Then,spinal needle was removed.GroupⅡwas given epidural injection of 5 mL normal saline containing 15 mg ephedrine before epidural catheterization.GroupⅢ was directly given epidural catheterization.The incidence of vascular injury was recorded in the three groups.The changes in heart rate(HR),systolic blood pressure(SBP) and diastolic blood pressure(DBP) were observed before injection(T0)and 2(T1)and 5 minutes(T2) after injection.Sensory block level was measured by a pinprick test at 5 and 10 minutes.Results The incidence of vascular injury in group Ⅲ(13.3%)was significantly higher than that in group Ⅰ(3.3%)or group Ⅱ(1.6%)(all P0.05),but no obvious difference was found between group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ(P0.05).The SBP levels at T0 were significantly lower than those at T1 or T2(all P0.05),but there were no obvious differences among the three groups(P0.05).Compared with group Ⅲ,sensory block level significantly increased in group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ(all P0.05),but no obvious difference was found between the two groups(P0.05).Conclusion Fluid preloading before epidural analgesia combined with lumbar epidural block for cesarean section can prevent epidural catheterization-induced vascular injury,increase the security of lumbar epidural anesthesia,and improve the efficacy of lumbar anesthesia.
作者 黄重峰 焦丰
出处 《实用临床医学(江西)》 CAS 2013年第1期40-43,共4页 Practical Clinical Medicine
关键词 腰硬联合麻醉 预充液 剖宫产 血管损伤 阻滞平面 combined spinal-epidural anesthesia fluid preloading cesarean section vascular injury sensory block level
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献39

  • 1徐世元.局麻药辅用肾上腺素与周围神经毒性[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2006,27(5):290-292. 被引量:11
  • 2Kyokong O, Charuluxananan S, Sriprajittichai P, et al. The incidence and risk factors of hypotension and bradycardia associated with spinal anesthesia. J Med Assoc Thai, 2006, 89 : S58-S64.
  • 3Mercier FJ, Bonnet MP, De la Dorie A, et al. Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: fluid loading, vasopressors and hypotension. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim, 2007, 26: 688-693.
  • 4Park GE, Hauch MA, Curlin F, et al. The effects of varying volumes of crystalloid administration before cesarean delivery on maternal hemodynamics and colloid osmotic pressure. Anesth Analg, 1996, 83: 299- 303.
  • 5Dahlgren G, Granath F, Pregner K, et al. Colloid vs crystalloid preloading to prevent maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2005, 49: 1200- 1206.
  • 6Choi DH, Ahn H J, Kim MH. Bupivacaine-sparing effect of fentanyl in spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2000, 25 : 240-245.
  • 7Choi DH, Ahn HJ, Kim JA. Combined low-dose spinal-epidural anesthesia versus single-shot spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2007, 16: 90-91.
  • 8Ueyama H, He YL, Tanigami H, et al. Effects of crystalloid and colloid preload on blood volume in the parturient undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section. Anesthesiology, 1999, 91: 1571-1576.
  • 9Techanivate A, Rodanant O, Taehawattanawisal W, et al. Intratheeal fentanyl for prevention of shivering in cesarean section. J Med Assoc Thai, 2005, 88: 1214-1221.
  • 10Mhyre JM, Greenfield ML, Tsen LC, et al. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials that evaluate strategies to avoid epidural vein cannulation during obstetric epidural catheter placement. Anesth Analg, 2009,108 : 1232-1242.

共引文献72

同被引文献25

  • 1Kim SY, Kim YY, Kim AR. Incidence of intravascular insertion in tho- racic epidural catheterization by using real time fluoroscopy[ J]. Kore- an J Anesthesiol,2012,62(3) :251-255.
  • 2Han C, Zhou Q, Ding Z, et al. Effects of epinephrine in the epidural space on the incidence of blood vessel injury by epidural catheter in- sertion for cesarean section: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study [ J ]. J Clin Anesth ,2015,27 ( 1 ) :7-11.
  • 3Geng G, Sun X, Huang S. Effect of preloading epidural space with nor- mal saline on the incidence of complications of epidural catheter place- ment and spinal anesthesia for cesarean section [ J ]. J Clin Monit Corn- put,2014,28 (3) :265-268.
  • 4Loubert C, O' Brien PJ, Fernando R, et al. Epidm-al volume extension in combined spinal epidural anaesthesia for elective caesarean section : a randomised controlled trial[J]. Anaesthesia,2011,66(5) :341-347.
  • 5Higuchi H,Takagi S, Onuki E, et al. Distribution of epidural saline up- on injection and the epidural volume effect in pregnant women [ J ]. Anesthesiology ,2011,114 (5) : 1155-1161.
  • 6Lechner TJ,van Wijk MG,Jongenelis AA,et al. The use of a sound- enabled device to measure pressure during insertion of an epidural catheter in women in labour [ J ]. Anaesthesia, 2011,66 ( 7 ) : 568- 573.
  • 7Sviggum HP, Farber MK. The incidence and management of inability to advance Arrow FlexTip Plus epidural catheters in obstetric patients [J]. Int J Obstet Anesth,2014,23(2) :113-117.
  • 8Han CB, Yu L, Qian YN, et al. Effects of predistention with normal saline containing adrenaline on blood-vessel injury during epidural catheter placement [ J ]. J Int Med Res,2011,39 ( 6 ) :2302-2306.
  • 9Mhyre JM, Greenfield ML,rlsen LC, et al. A systematic review of ran- domized controlled trials that evaluate strategies to avoid epidural vein cannulation during obstetric epidural catheter placement [ J ]. Anesth Analg,2009,108(4) :1232-1242.
  • 10Shih CK,Wang FY,Shieh CF,et al. Soft catheters reduce the risk of intravascular eannulation during epidural bloek-a retrospective anal- ysis of 1117 eases in a medical center[J]. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2012,28 (7) :373-376.

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部