民间资本参与是否增进了中国城市基础设施绩效被引量：14

Has Non-Governmental Capital Participating-in Improved the Performance of Municipal Infrastructure in China

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文基于中国35个大中城市2002-2009年面板数据实证考察了民间资本参与对城市基础设施绩效的影响。结果发现,民间资本参与度的变化当期显著推动了城市基础设施绩效的改进,但其长期效应并不显著;不同地区产生了迥异的效应:东部地区的民间资本参与度变化仅在当期对城市基础设施绩效产生正向显著影响,而中西部地区相应效应却仅存在于滞后期;国内民间资本参与显著增进了城市基础设施的绩效,而国际资本参与的相应效应却并不显著。 In this paper, the author does an empirical study on the impact of non-governmental capital participating-in on the performance of municipal infrastructure based on the panel data of 35 major cities from 2002 to 2009 in China. The results display that： Changes of participating-in level of non-governmental capital significantly promoted the performance of municipal infrastructure in current, but related long-term effects were not significant; It had different effects in different areas： in eastern area, effects of the changes of non-governmental capital＇ s participating-in on performance of municipal infrastructure were significantly positive only in the current, while the similar effects in mid-west area were only in the lag; Domestic non-governmental capital＇ s participating-in brought about a significant improvement in municipal infrastructure＇ s performance, but international capital＇ s was not significant.

作者苑德宇

机构地区中国社会科学院财经战略研究院财政研究室

出处《统计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期23-31,共9页 Statistical Research

基金 "我国公共投资与民间投资关系研究:理论与实证"(20100481207)的阶段性成果

关键词民间资本城市基础设施绩效 Non-Governmental Capital Municipal Infrastructure Performance

分类号 C812 [社会学—统计学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献15

1Andres, L., Foster, V. and Guasch, L.. The Impact of Privatization on the Performance of the Infrastructure Sector, The Case of Electricity Distribution in Latin American Countries [ M ]. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2006, No. 3936.
2Andres, L.. The Impact of Privatization on Firms in the Infrastructure Sector in Latin American Countries. University of Chicago Dissertation, 2004.
3Clarke, G. , Kosec, K. and Wallaten, S.. Has Private Participation in Water and Sewerage Improved Coverage? Empirical Evidence from Latin America [ J ]. Journal of International Development, 2009 (21) :327 - 361.
4Crampes C, Estache A.. Regulating Water Concessions: Lessons from the Buenos Aires Concession [ M ]. Public Policy for the Private Sector, World Bank: Washington DC, 1996.
5Estaehc, A. and Rossi, A.. How Different is the Efficiency of Public and Private Water Companies in Asia? [ J]. World Bank Economic Review, 2002(16) : 139 - 148.
6Fink, C. , Mattoo, A. and Rathindran, R.. An Assessment of Telecommunications Reform in Developing Countries [ J ]. Information Economics & Policy, 2003 ( 15 ) : 443 - 466.
7Kirkpatrik, C. and Parker, D.. Domestic Regulation and the WTO: the Case of Water Services[J]. World Economy, 2005 (28) : 1491 -1508.
8Wallsten, J.. An Econometric Analysis of Telecom Competition, Privatization and Regulation in Africa and Latin America[ J ]. Journal of Industrial Economics, 2001 (49) : 1 - 19.
9Zhang, Y. , Parker, D. and Kirkpatrick, C.. Competition, Regulation, and Privatization of Electricity Generation in Developing Countries. Does the Sequencing of the Reforms Matter.'? [ J ]. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2005 (45) : 358 - 379.
10Andres, L. , Foster, V. and Guasch, L.. Private Participation in Infrastructure in the Latin American Region [ M]. World Bank, 2007.