期刊文献+

碳管制效率、政府能力与碳排放 被引量:9

Carbon Control Efficiency,Government Efforts and Carbon Emission
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在碳约束时代追求经济增长与环境保护双赢发展的要求下,探索兼顾发展与控制的平衡路径具有重要的意义。本文构造了一个引入随机边界分析的STIRPAT模型,从国际比较的视角,研究政府能力和碳管制效率对控制碳排放的影响作用。研究结论显示,过去10多年来,各国的碳管制效率并没有太大的改进,且在2008年金融危机期间还出现了明显的下降,表明各国在探索提升碳管制效率以及有效控制碳排放方面还有很长的路要走。中国的碳管制效率总体上位居世界前列,超过了美国和欧盟,但低于日本,碳管制领域的法制力度和政府效率是影响中国碳管制效率提升的主要因素,而加强政府能力将有助于提升碳管制效率,进而促进节能减排。 By using an expanded STIRPAT model, this paper researches the impacts for energy conservation and reduction of carbon emission from the perspective of government efforts and carbon control efficiency. The result shows that the most efficient area of carbon control is North America. South America and Russia 's federal district are next to it. Overall, the carbon control efficiencies have not been significantly increased in most countries, the carbon control efficiency even decreased in 2008. This indicates there is a long way to go for exploring carbon control efficiency. China's carbon control efficiency is better than the United States and the European Union, but less than Japan. Legal system and government efficiency are the key factors of promoting the carbon control efficiency in China. Strengthening the government efforts will help promoting carbon control efficiency and effectively controlling the carbon emissions.
作者 支燕
机构地区 南开大学
出处 《统计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期64-72,共9页 Statistical Research
关键词 碳管制效率 政府能力 节能减排 STIRPAT模型 Carbon Control Efficiency Government Efforts Reduction of Carbon Emission STIRPAT Model
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Coelli,T. J. , 1996. A guide to FRONTIER version4, 1:a computer program for stochastic frontier production and cost function estimation I R ~. Centre for efficiency and productivity analysis (CEPA), Working papers.
  • 2Ehrlich, P. , Holden, J. , 1972. One-dimensional economy [ J ]. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 28 (5) :16 -27.
  • 3George J. Stigler. 1971. The Theory of Economic Regulation [ J ]. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Vol. , 2,No1.
  • 4Harrison, P. , Pearce, F. , 2000. AAAS Atlas of population and environment[ M ]. University of California Press, Los Angeles.
  • 5Jorgenson, A, K. , 2009. The transnational organization of population, the scale of degradation, and coefficient: a study of carbon dioxide emissions in less-developed countries [ J ]. Human Ecology Review, 16:64 - 74.
  • 6Jorgenson, A, K. , Clark, B. , Kentor, J. ,2010. Militarization and the environment: a panel study of carbon dioxide emissions and the ecological footprints of nations, 1970 - 2000 [ J ]. Global Environmental Polities, 10:7 - 29.
  • 7Jorgenson, A. , Clark, B. ,2010. Assessing the temporal stability of the population/environment relationship in comparative perspective: a cross-national panel study of carbon dioxide emissions [ J ]. Population and Environment,32 ( 1 ) : 27 - 41.
  • 8Kaufmann, D. , Kraay, A. , Mastruzzi, M. 2009. Governance matters VIII: Aggregate and Individual Governance indicators 1996- 2008 [ R ]. Working paper ( Washington, DC : Word Bank, 2009).
  • 9MonChi Lio, JinLI Hu. 2009. Production efficiency: a cross-country aggregate frontier analysis [ J ]. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(1) :40 -61.
  • 10Richard York, Eugene A. Rosa, Thomas Dietz. 2003. STIRPAT, IPAT, and IMPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts [ J ]. Ecological Economics ,46:351 - 365.

二级参考文献17

共引文献368

同被引文献125

引证文献9

二级引证文献198

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部