期刊文献+

预收保费与保险责任承担制度研究 被引量:2

Study on Premiums Received in Advance and Temporary Insurance System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前,在审理保险人预收保费至保险人承保前发生保险事故的赔偿纠纷案件时,审理法院通常认为:保险人预收保费的事实与保险合同成立没有直接关系,预收保费不能证明保险合同成立,保险人对在预收保费后至承保前发生的保险事故不承担保险责任。大多数国家的保险法根据契约公平原则,规定了暂保险和强制临时保险制度。对预收保费后至承保前发生的保险事故,要求保险人依约定或法定承担保险责任。在我国保险市场已经成为国际保险市场的有效组成部分的今天,应当建立以保险立法和司法方式干预保险责任承担机制,为投保人和被保险人提供法律救济。 In China, involving the compensation or disputes arising from the insurer' s receipt of the insurance to the accidents occurring before the insurance underwriting, the jurisdictional courts always deem that the fact that the insurance premium received in advance has nothing to do with the establishment of the insurance contract and the premiums received in advance cannot be the evidence of the insurance contracts' existence. The insurer doesn't bear the insurance liability of the accidents which has occurred from the insurer' s receipt of the insurance to the accidents occurring before the insurance underwriting. However, the insurance law of most of the countries and districts stipulate that according to the principle of fairness, the insurance should bear the insurance liability under the conditions mentioned above. In China, our insurance market has become an effective part of international insurance market today. Aiming at the problem mentioned above, we should establish a way of insurance legislation and judicial intervention in the insurance accountability mechanism, and use for reference of the compulsory and provisional insurance, provisional insurance policies so that we can improve our current insurance legislation and protect the legal rights of the applicants and the insured with justice.
作者 黄海 史卫进
出处 《金融发展研究》 2013年第3期71-76,共6页 Journal Of Financial Development Research
关键词 预收保费 保险责任 法律和司法干预 临时保险 premiums received in advance, insurance liability, legal and judicial intervention, temporary insurance
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1MALCOLM A CLARKE.保险合同法[M].何美欢,吴志攀,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2002:421.
  • 2小罗伯特·H.杰瑞,道格拉斯·R.里上满,之彦译.美国保险法精解[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2009.
  • 3刘宗荣.新保险法:保险契约法的理论与实务[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009.
  • 4梁鹏.候保期间事故之赔付探讨[J].法学家,2011(2):103-115. 被引量:6

二级参考文献31

  • 1李利,许崇苗,王宗玉.对信诚寿险案二审胜诉的法理分析[J].保险研究,2005(3):69-74. 被引量:4
  • 2[美]小罗伯特·H·杰瑞,道格拉斯·R·里士满.《美国保险法精解》,李之彦译,北京大学出版社2009年1月版,第102页.
  • 3Robert E. Keeton, "Insurance Law Rights at Variance with Policy Provision", 83 Harv. L. Rev. (1970), p.967.
  • 4Gaunt v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. 160 F. 2d. 601.
  • 5Duffle v. Banker' Life Association, 160 Iowa 19, 139 N. W. 1087 (1913).
  • 6施文森.《保险法论文》(第一集),三民书局1988年增订第7版,第54页.
  • 7See Robert E. Keeton, Basic Text on Insurance law, West Publishing Co., 1971, p.36.
  • 8See Emeric Fischer, Peter Nash Swisher, Jeffrey W. Stempel, Principles oflnsurance Law, (Third edition), Matthew Bender & company,Inc., 2004, p.294.
  • 9See Jeffrey W. Stempel, Interpretation of Insurance Contracts . Law and Strategy for Insurers and Policyholders, Little, Brown and Company,1994, p.61.
  • 10See E. R. Hardy Ivamy, Genera/Principles oflnsurance Law, (4th edition), Butterworths, 1979, p.103.

共引文献25

同被引文献5

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部