期刊文献+

“自下而上”与“自上而下”本体构建方法的探讨 被引量:5

The construction of ontology: Top-down approach vs bottom-up approach
原文传递
导出
摘要 本体构建旨在对知识体系的概念和关系建模并形成体系化的知识,从而辅助计算机进行智能化的处理。上位本体包含的概念是与领域无关的通用概念集,而多数通过算法自动提取而获得的本体主要用于特定领域的概念知识。本文首先介绍在本体构建中领域核心本体(也称中位本体)和应用(也称下位本体)之间的关系。然后以计算机领域为例,阐述一个如何利用英文的上位本体SUMO通过"自上而下"的方法建立的中位本体。基于下位本体的特性,本文进而介绍一种"自下而上"的本体构建方法。 Ontology construction aims to build conceptual knowledge in such a way that the relations among major concepts can be explicitly identified and presented in a machine operable way so as to assist in intelligent processing of computer applications. An upper-level ontology includes general concepts that are used broadly across different domains whereas ontologies acquired by computing through algorithms automatically are more likely to be domain specific. This paper first introduces domain specific core ontology ( mid-level ontology) and application domain ontology ( lower-level ontology) . Then,it presents a top-down approach to build a core ontology for Chinese in the IT domain based on the English upper level ontology SUMO and other English-Chinese resources available. The paper also introduces a bottom-up approach to build domain specific ontology using corpus based approach.
出处 《当代语言学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期129-141,250,共13页 Contemporary Linguistics
关键词 本体自动构建 上位本体 中位本体(领域核心本体) 下位本体/应用 本体上下位关系 automatic ontology construction,upper-level ontology,mid-level ontology ( domain core ontology) ,application domain ontology / lower level ontology,hypernym relations
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Brewster, C. , F. Ciravegna, and Y. Wilks. 2002. User-centred ontology learning for knowl- edge management. Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems. Stockholm, Sweden. Lecture Notes in Computer Sci- ences. Springer-Verlag. Pp. 203 - 7.
  • 2Chandrasekaran, B., J. R. Josephson, and V. R. Benjamins. 1999. Ontologies: What are they? Why do we need them? IEEE Intelligent Systems and their Applications 14,1:20 -6.
  • 3Chen, Y. 2011. Relation extraction for ontology extension using integrated evi- dences. Ph.D. diss. , Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
  • 4Chen, Y., Q. Lu , W. Li and G. Cui. 2008. Chinese core ontology construction from a bilingual term bank. The 6th International Conference on Language Resource and Evaluation, Marrakech, Morocco.
  • 5Chen, Y., Q. Lu, W. Li, Z. Sui , and L. Ji . 2006. A study on ter- minology extraction based on classified corpora. Proceedings of the 5th International Con- ference on Language Resources and Evaluation ( LREC' 06). Genoa, Italy. CD-ROM ver- sion.
  • 6Cui, G. , Q. Lu, W. Li, and Y. Chen. 2009. Automatic acquisition of attributes for ontolo- gy construction. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computer Processing of Oriental Languages (CCPOL 2009), Hang Kong. Pp. 248- 59.
  • 7Doerr, M., J. Hunter, and C. Lagoze. 2003. Towards a core ontology for information inte- gration. Journal of Digital Information 4,1 : 169.
  • 8Gangemi, A., N. Guarino, C. Masolo, A. 01tramari, and L. Schneider. 2002. Sweetening ontologies with DOLCE. Ontologies and the Semantic Web. Proceedings of the 13th Inter-national Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Springer-Ver- lag. Pp. 166 - 81.
  • 9Ganter, B. and R. Wille. 1999. Formal Concept Analysis, Mathematical Foundations. Berlin/ Heidelberg/New York : Springer.
  • 10Gomez-Perez, A. and D. Manzano-Macho. 2003. A survey of ontology learning methods and techniques. OntoWeb Deliverable, OntoWeb Consortium.

二级参考文献27

共引文献6

同被引文献53

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部