期刊文献+

麦克道威尔第二自然的自然主义疏论

Exploration on McDowell’s Naturalism of Second Nature
原文传递
导出
摘要 从中世纪隐秘的自然观向现代科学的自然观的转变是时代的进步,但是现代科学把自然描绘成由因果律支配的领域,由此造成了人的机体和心灵、理性和自然的分裂。麦克道威尔的第二自然的自然主义试图通过对感受性的概念性和自发性的自然性的论证,来说明由于自发性的卷入,我们的自然和动物单凭本能获得的自然相比是独特的,但是自发性是通过教育进入我们的生活的,是和感受性一样自然的潜能。第二自然是人类唯一拥有的自然,我们拥有理性但仍在自然之中。 The transformation from the medieval magic view of nature to modern scientific view of nature is a progress, but in modern science nature is described as the realm governed by law, which has resulted in the divorce between human body and mind, reason and nature. McDowell’s naturalism of the second nature seeks to prove how receptivity is conceptual and how spontaneity is natural, and show that because of the involvement of spontaneity into the construction of nature, our nature is distinct from that of the animal acquired merely by instinct. But spontaneity enters ours life via education, so it is a kind of potential as natural as receptivity. The second nature is the only nature possessed by human being. We possess reason, but we are still inside nature.
作者 陈四海
出处 《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期9-14,125,共6页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature
关键词 自发性 感受性 第一自然 第二自然 Spontaneity Receptivity First nature Second nature
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1O.纽拉特,王玉北.科学的世界观:维也纳小组——献给石里克[J].世界哲学,1994(1):36-44. 被引量:19
  • 2约翰·麦克道威尔.心灵与世界[M].刘叶涛,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:94.
  • 3唐纳德·戴维森.关于真理与知识的融贯论[A],真理、意义与方法--戴维森哲学文选[c],牟博译,北京:商务印书馆,2008:341.
  • 4康德 邓晓芒译.纯粹理性批判[M].北京:人民出版社,2004.170-171.
  • 5Lindgaard, J., John McDowell: Experience, Worm, and Nature [C]. Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2008: 73.
  • 6Putnam, H., McDowell's Mind and McDowell's World [A]. Reading McDowell:on Mind and World[C]. Nicholas H. Smith. London and New York: Routledge, 2002: 174.
  • 7McDowell, J., Responses [A]. Reading McDowell:on Mind and World[C]. Nicholas H. Smith. London and New York: Routledge, 2002: 292-293.
  • 8Rorty, R., McDowell, Davidson, and Spontaneity [J]. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1998, 58(2): 389-394.
  • 9MeDowell, J., Reply to Commentators [J]. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 1998, 58(2): 403-431.

共引文献442

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部