期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

类比推理模拟理论与上升程序模拟理论的差异

The Differences Between Analogical Simulation and Ascent Routines Simulation
原文传递
导出
摘要 类比模拟理论与上升程序模拟理论都承认相似性是模拟的基础,但是,前者认为自我心智认知的方式是内省,对他心的认知方式是内省加上类比推理,后者则认为自我认知方式是上升程序,对他心的认知是上升程序与移情的结合。 Both the analogical simulation and the ascent routines simulation admit that similarity is the base for simulation, but the former considers the way of self-mindreading is introspection, while people read other’s mind by introspection & analogical reasoning; the latter claims self-mindreading by ascent routines, people read other’s mind with ascent routines and empathy.
作者 黄家裕
机构地区 浙江师范大学法政学院 广西财经学院
出处 《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期15-18,25,共5页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金 国家社会科学基金项目资助(项目编号:11CZX006) "中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助"
关键词 模拟 类比推理 上升程序 差异 Simulation Analogical reasoning Ascent routines Differences
分类号 N0 [自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Goldman, A. I., Empathy, Mind, and Morals Proceedings and Addresses of the American [J]. PhilosophicalAssociation. 1992. 66, 17-41.
  • 2Goldman, A. I., Readings in Philosophy and Cognitive Science [C]. Cambridge, The MIT Press. 1993.
  • 3Goldman, A. I., The Psychology of Folk Psychology [J]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1993.16, 15-28.
  • 4Goldman, A. I., Simulation and Interpersonal [J]. Utility. 1995. 105, 709-726.
  • 5Goldman, A. I., In Defense of the Simulation Theory [A]. In M. Davies and T. Stone eds. Folk Psychology: The Theory of Mind Debate [C]. Cambridge, Blackwell. 1995. 191-206.
  • 6Goldman, I. A., Interpretation Psychologized [J]. In M. Davies and T. Stone eds. Folk Psychology: The Theory of Mind Debate [C]. Cambridge, Blackwell. 1995.74-99.
  • 7Goldman, A. I., Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading[M]. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 2006.
  • 8Goldman, A. I., Hurley on Simulation [J]. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 2008.7, 775-788.
  • 9Gordon, R. M., Folk Psychology as Simulation[J]. Mind and language. 1986. 1,158-171.
  • 10Gordon, R. M., Desire and Self-intervention [J]. Nous. 1986. 20, 221-238.

二级参考文献20

  • 1Davies, Martin & Stone, Tony ( eds ), Mental Simulation : Evaluations and Applications, Cambridge, MA : Blackwell, 1995b,pp. 2 -4 ,pp. 87 - 108.
  • 2Robert M. Gordon, "Folk Psychology as Simulation", Mind and Language, 1986,1, pp. 158 - 171.
  • 3Davies, Martin & Stone, Tony ( eds), Folk Psychology : The Theory of Mind Debate, Cambridge, MA : Blackwell, 1995a, pp. 74 - 99, pp. 84 - 85.
  • 4Robert M. Gordon, "Ascent Routines For Propositional Attitudes", Synthese,2007,159, pp. 151 - 165.
  • 5Alvin I. Goldman, Simulating Minds : The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading, Oxford University Press, 2006.
  • 6Stich, Stenphen P and Nichols, Shaun, "Cognitive Penetrability, Rationality and Restricted Simulation", Mind & Language, 1997,12 ,pp. 297 - 326.
  • 7Ross, L. , Lepper, M. R. and Hubbard, M. , "Perseverance in Self - perception and Social Perception : Biased Attributional Processes in the Debriefing Paradigm", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975,32, pp. 880 - 892.
  • 8Umilta M., Kohler E., Gallese V., et al. "I Know What You Are Doing" : A Neurophysiological Study. Neuron, 2001, 31 (1) : 155 - 165.
  • 9Goldman, A. I. Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. Oxford Univensity Press,2006.
  • 10Gallese, V., and Goldman, A. Mirror Neurons and The Simulation Theory of Mind - reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1998, 2: 493 - 501.

共引文献6

自然辩证法通讯
2013年 第2期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部