期刊文献+

证据的分组合成法 被引量:17

Grouping method for combining evidence
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了提高证据融合的精确度并降低融合的运算量,结合批量式融合和序贯式融合的优点,提出证据分组合成法.该方法首先判断证据间是否可用Dempster组合规则进行合成,若可以,则两证据归为同组;否则归为不同组.对于同组证据,利用Dempster组合规则直接合成,即组内证据序贯式融合;对于不同组证据,通过最优化模型修正各组证据源,再利用Dempster组合规则合成,即组间证据批量式融合.算例分析验证了该方法具有运算量小、稳定性好、精确度高的特点. To improve the precision of evidence fusion and simplify its computation, a grouping method for combining evidence is proposed to take the advantages of sequence fusion and batch fusion. Firstly, the proposed method judges whether the pieces of evidence can be combined by using Dempster rule of combination. If the pieces of evidence are judged to be fused with Dempster rule of combination, they will be put into the same group. Otherwise, they will be put into different groups. The evidence in the same group is combined directly with Dempster rule of combination, which forms sequence fusion within groups. For the evidence in different groups, an optimization model is developed to modify the evidence, and then combined with Dempster rule of combination, which forms batch fusion among groups. Numerical examples are provided to demonstrate the advantages of the proposed method, such as less computation, better stability and higher precision.
出处 《控制与决策》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期574-578,584,共6页 Control and Decision
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70925004) 福建省教育厅科技项目(JA11269) 福建江夏学院青年科技项目(2012C030)
关键词 D-S理论 Pignistic概率距离 证据分组合成法 D-Stheory Pignistic probability distance a grouping method for combining evidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Dempster A P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping[J]. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1967, 38(2): 325-339.
  • 2Sharer G. A mathematical theory of evidence[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976: 1-50.
  • 3Wang Y M, Yang J B, Xu D L, et al. The evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision making using interval belief degrees[J]. European J of Operational Research, 2006, 175(1): 35-66.
  • 4Murphy K. Combing belief functions when evidence conflicts[J]. Decision Support System, 2000, 29(1):1-9.
  • 5Deng Y, Shi W K, Zhu Z F, et al. Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2004, 38(3): 489-493.
  • 6王小艺,刘载文,侯朝桢,原菊梅,郭飞.一种基于最优权重分配的D-S改进算法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(11):103-107. 被引量:16
  • 7梁昌勇,叶春森,张恩桥.一种基于一致性证据冲突的证据合成方法[J].中国管理科学,2010,18(4):152-157. 被引量:6
  • 8熊彦铭,杨战平,屈新芬.基于模型修正的冲突证据组合新方法[J].控制与决策,2011,26(6):883-887. 被引量:26
  • 9Lefevre E, Colot O. Belief function combination and conflict management[J]. Information Fusion, 2002, 3(2): 149-162.
  • 10Smets P. Analyzing the combination of conflicting belief functions[J]. Information Fusion, 2007, 8(4): 387-412.

二级参考文献59

共引文献73

同被引文献200

引证文献17

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部