期刊文献+

小麦纤维素联合莫沙比利口服治疗慢传输型便秘的临床疗效

Oral Administration of Wheat Cellulose and Mosapride in the Treatment of Slow Transit Constipation
原文传递
导出
摘要 为探讨小麦纤维素联合莫沙比利口服治疗慢传输型便秘(sTc)的临床疗效,将150例STC随机分为治疗组和对照组,各75例,治疗组予小麦纤维素联合莫沙比利口服,对照组单纯给予莫沙比利口服,对比两组临床疗效及复发情况。结果显示,(1)临床疗效:治疗4周后,治疗组临床痊愈27例,显效31例,有效12例,无效5例,总有效率为93.3%(70/75);对照组临床痊愈9例,显效15例,有效28例,无效23例,总有效率为69.3%(52/75)。治疗组总有效率明显高于对照组,P〈0.05。(2)复发情况:对有效者随访6个月,治疗组复发率为25.7%(18/70),对照组复发率为67.3%(35/52)。治疗组复发率明显低于对照组,P〈0.05。结果表明,小麦纤维素联合莫沙比利口服治疗STC疗效肯定,服用方便,无腹痛、腹泻及药物性依赖等副作用,患者易接受,而且复发率低,可作为STC的首选治疗方案。 The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical effect of oral administration of wheat cellulose and mosapride for teating slow transit constipation(STC). The 150 cases of STC were randomly divided into treatment group and contrl group, 75 cases for eachtreatment group received oral wheat cellu- lose plus mosapride,while control group alone oral mosapride,then the clinical effect and recurrence status were compared between both groups. As results, 1) clinical effect, after treatment lasted 4 weeks in treat- ment group, 27 cases were cured, 31, excellent response, 12 effective, 5 non-response, and total effective rate was 93.3^(70/75) ,meanwhile,in control group,9,15,28,23,and 69.3^(52/75) respectively,thus the to- tal effective rate of treatment group was significantly higher than that of control group( P d0.05)~2)re- currence status:a follow-up lasted 6 months to the effective case showed that recurrecue rate of treatment group was significantly lower than that of control group(18/70,25.7% vs 35/52,67.3% P 〈0.05). Re- sults show that oral administration of wheat cellulose plus mosapride in the treatment of STC has following merits:certain curative effect, conventionally to use, no adverse reactions as abdominal pain, diarrhea and substance dependence,etc,as well as low recurrence rate,patients being liable to use it,thus this combina- tion for treating STC could be as the first choice.
出处 《中国肛肠病杂志》 2013年第2期34-35,共2页 Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
关键词 慢传输型便秘 小麦纤维素 莫沙比利 疗效 Slow transit constipation Wheat cellulose Mosapride Therapeutic effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献27

  • 1Tramonte SM,Brand MB,Mulrow CD,et al.The treatment of chronic constipation in adults,A systematic review[J].J Gen Intern Med,1997,12(1):15-24.
  • 2Corazziari E,Badiali D,Bazzocchi G,et al.Long term efficacy,safety,and tolerability of low daily doses of osmotic polyethylene glycol electrolyte balanced solution (PMF-100) in the treatment of functional chronic constipation[J].Gut,2000,46(4)∶522-526.
  • 3Di Palma JA,DeRidder PH,Orlando RC,et al.A randomized,placebo-controlled,multicenter study of the safety and efficacy of a new polyethylene glycol laxative[J].Am J Gastroenterol,2000,95(2):446-450.
  • 4Chaussade S,Minic M.Comparison of efficacy and safety of two doses of two different polyethylene glycol-based laxatives in the treatment of constipation[J].Aliment Pharmacol Ther,2003,17(1):165-172.
  • 5Attar A,Lemann M,Ferguson A,et al.Comparison of a low dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution with lactulose for treatment of chronic constipation[J].Gut,1999,44(2):226-230.
  • 6McRorie JW,Daggy BP,Morel JG,et al.Psyllium is superior to docusate sodium for treatment of chronic constipation[J].Aliment Pharmacol Ther,1998,12(5):491-497.
  • 7Lembo A,Camilleri M.Chronic constipation[J].N Engl J Med,2003,49(14):1360-1368.
  • 8Sloots CE,Poen AC,Kerstens R,et al.Effects of prucalopride on colonic transit,anorectal function and bowel habits in patients with chronic constipation[J].Aliment Pharmacol Ther,2002,16(4):759-767.
  • 9Coremans G,Kerstens R,De Pauw M,et al.Prucalopride is effective in patients with severe chronic constipation in whom laxatives fail to provide adequate relief.Results of a double-blind,placebo-controlled clinical trial[J].Digestion,2003,67(1-2)∶82-89.
  • 10Talley NJ.Evaluation of drug treatment in irritable bowel syndrome[J].Br J Clin Pharmacol,2003,56(5):362-369.

共引文献232

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部