期刊文献+

论孟德斯鸠对亚里士多德式政体理论的改造 被引量:2

Montesquieu's Transformation of Aristotle's Regime Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 关于政体理论,亚里士多德和孟德斯鸠无疑是西方政治思想史上两个重要的里程碑,同时,政体理论也都构成了他们政治思想的基础。从形式上来看,孟德斯鸠承袭了亚里士多德政体分类的框架,并通过这样的框架讲出了十分不同的内容。孟德斯鸠从根本上改变了亚里士多德的政体分类原则,德性不再作为区分政体优劣的根本标准,原因在于他将德性从其与智慧的关系中剥离开来,而降低为一种激情。于是,对于所有的政体,其动力——德性、荣誉、恐惧,都将处于激情的层面。因此,无论哪种政体,其权力的本质都是一致的。另一个与亚里士多德分类非常不同的地方在于:孟德斯鸠将专制主义单列为一种政体类型。这一方面是出于现实政治的考虑,另一方面也是由于上述原则的改变所致,专制主义这种权力最原始的表现形式,成了现代政体最危险的演变可能。孟德斯鸠正是在这个意义上改写了亚里士多德的政体理论。 Both Montesquieu and Aristotle have made great contribution to the formation of the regime theory in the West.It seems that Montesquieu has inherited Aristotle's classification of the regimes but in fact he changed Aristotle's principle of classification.Montesquieu does not regard morality as the basic criterion for distinguishing the good regime from the bad one because he considers morality as a passion and all regimes' motive forces like morality,glory and fear remain at the level of passion.Thus,all regimes are the same in terms of the nature of power.Different form Aristotle,Montesquieu views despotism as a regime due to his political consideration and change in principle.Despotism is the most primitive expression of power and the most dangerous one for the change of a modern regime,and in this sense,Montesquieu has transformed Aristotle's regime theory.
作者 葛耘娜
机构地区 北京大学
出处 《云南大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期63-69,111-112,共7页 The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Sharon Krause. Despotism in The spirit of law [ A ]. in David W. Carrithers, Michael A. Mosher and Paul A. Rahe (eds), Montesqieu ' s science of politics: essays on "The Spirit of Laws" [ C ]. Lanham: Rowman&LittefieldPublishers, INC, 2001.
  • 2伏尔泰.风俗论(上)[M].梁守锵译.北京:商务印书馆,1994.
  • 3Melvin Richter, Montesquieu' s Comparative Analysis of Eu- rope and Asia: intended and unintended consequences [ A ]. in Alberto Postigliola (ed). L' Europe de Motesquieu [ C]. Naples : LiguoriEditore ; Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.
  • 4亚里士多德.《政治学》[M].商务印书馆,1965年版.第167页.
  • 5Montesquieu, De l' Esprit des Lois, , Ed. Laurent Versini, Gallimard, 1995, p96.
  • 6Montesquieu, Considerationssur les canses de la grandeur des Romains et de leurdecadence, Ed. Catherine Volpilhac-Auger avec la collaboration de Catherine Larrere, Galliard, 1998.
  • 7Thomas L. Pangle, Momesquieu' s Philosophy of Liberalism: A Commentary on The Spirit of the Laws, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press (1973) , pp. 50 -51.
  • 8Marcel Prelot, "Montesquieu et las Formes de Gouvernement," dans La PenseesPolitique et Con- stitutionnelle de Momesquieu: Bieentenaire de L' Esprit des Lois 1748 -1948, publieparl' Institut de droitcompare de la Facult6 de droit de Paris, R6impression avec 1' aimableautofisation des editionsSirey, Paris (1952) , pp. 122 -123.
  • 9丁耘:“德性、阶级与政体——从亚里士多德的政体学说出发”,载于王绍光主编,《理想政治秩序:中西古今的探求》,生活·读书·新知三联书店2012年版,第38页.
  • 10亚里士多德在《尼各马可伦理学》第八卷第10章.

同被引文献13

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部