《清实录》议叙机制研究

A study on the Awarding System of QINGSHILU

按清制,每部实录进呈后,都要对纂修人员进行议叙。在漫长的纂修实践中,《清实录》议叙由草创而渐趋规范化、制度化。然而,清中叶以降,在流弊滋生、政治生态环境日益恶劣的时代语境下,由实录议叙衍生出的投机钻营、以权谋私、贪腐舞弊丑闻频频曝光、屡禁不止。实录议叙的宿疾,从表面上看,是议叙过优,但从根源上看,则是议叙制度本身缺陷、监管部门的不作为、官场内部的"集体无意识"、公权力的"不检点"以及后续问责过轻等诸多因素合力使然。

According to the system of Qing Dynasty, after each Shilu submission, all compiling personals were awarded. During its long practice,the awarding system of QINGSHILU grew from its initial form into regularization and systemization. However,after middle Qing Dynasty,with the abuses growing and political environment worsening increasingly, there appeared more and more scandals of congenial secure personal gain, abusing power for personal corruption and fraud deriving from the awarding system. On the surface, the old trouble for QINGSHILU awarding lied in its being superior to other officially compiled books. But in substance, it jointly resulted from many factors, such as the defects of awarding system,the supervision department＇s nonfeasance, the collective unconsciousness inside the officialdom, the public power＇s profligacy,and the subsequent denunciation being light.