期刊文献+

某隧道隧底填充结构裂损差异分析 被引量:4

Analysis on Crack Damage Difference of Filling Structure at a Tunnel Invert
下载PDF
导出
摘要 某隧道进口段仰拱填充结构在施工期出现大量裂缝,且左线裂缝明显比右线裂缝多。通过现场考察发现,隧道进口段地表的地形明显存在一定坡度,左高右低,这种情况在一定程度上导致隧道左、右线所处位置的地下水头高度存在一定差别。通过对围岩渗流场计算得出,左线隧道仰拱中心底部最大水压力值为0.235 MPa,右线隧道仰拱中心底部最大水压力值为0.207 MPa,作用在左线隧道仰拱中心底部的最大水压力比作用在右线隧道仰拱中心底部的最大水压力约大12%。从衬砌结构受力计算结果得到,隧道左线仰拱填充结构的最大主力极值大于隧道右线仰拱填充结构的最大主力极值,且两者均大于或稍大于仰拱填充材料C20混凝土的极限抗拉强度,导致仰拱填充结构开裂,并出现隧道左线仰拱填充结构拉张裂缝较多,而右线仰拱填充结构拉张裂缝较少的现象。 A large number of cracks once appeared on the filling structure of the invert at the entrance region of a tunnel in the construction period, and the crack number of the left line was obviously more than that of the right line. Through field investigation, it was found that there was a certain gradient slope of ground surface at the tunnel entrance region and the left side was higher than the right side, thus it generated a ground water head difference between the left line and the right line of the tunnel to a certain degree. Then the results of the calculation on the seepage field of the surrounding rock showed that: the maximum value of water pressure acting on the center of the invert of the left line tunnel was 0. 235 MPa, and in the right line tunnel it was 0. 207 MPa, so the former was greater than the latter about 12%. Furthermore, the results of stress calculation on the lining structure showed that: the maximum principal stress value of the filling structure of the left line invert was greater than that of the right line invert, and both were greater than or slightly larger than the ultimate tensile strength of C20 concrete which was used as the filling material of the invert. So these reasons had caused a large number of cracks on the filling structure of the invert, with the phenomenon that the crack number of the left line was more than that of the right line.
出处 《铁道标准设计》 北大核心 2013年第4期92-95,100,共5页 Railway Standard Design
基金 中国中铁股份有限公司科技开发计划课题和中铁十八局自主立项课题资助(编号:重点-40-2011)
关键词 铁路隧道 仰拱 开裂差异 水压力 极限抗拉强度 railway tunnel invert crack damage difference water pressure ultimate tensile strength
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献36

  • 1陈建锋,石振明,陈竹昌.砂井地基平面问题转换及其应用[J].岩土工程技术,2001,15(1):23-26. 被引量:10
  • 2钟新樵.土质偏压隧道衬砌模型试验分析[J].西南交通大学学报,1996,31(6):602-606. 被引量:33
  • 3GB50010-2002.混凝土结构设计规范[S].[S].,..
  • 4关宝树,隧道力学概论,1993年
  • 5王维存,隧道及地下工程,1992年,3期,41页
  • 6刘培德,隧道及地下工程,1986年,1期,1页
  • 7王廷伯.连江连拱隧道设计与施工[A]..2001年全国公路隧道学术会议论文集[C].北京:人民交通出版社,2001.178-180.
  • 8夏保祥 程崇国 林勇.三车道大断面公路隧道结构试验研究[A]..2003年全国公路隧道学术会议论文集[C].北京:人民交通出版社,2003.23-31.
  • 9靳晓光 刘伟 陈少华.小净距公路隧道施工过程的数值模拟[A]..2003年全国公路隧道学术会议论文集[C].北京:人民交通出版社,2003.118-124.
  • 10李国锋 徐华安 赵会兵.连拱隧道施工技术[A]..2001年全国公路隧道学术会议论文集[C].北京:人民交通出版社,2001.181-187.

共引文献197

同被引文献24

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部