期刊文献+

基于考试内容的专家判断法在医学合格标准设定中的实践与探索 被引量:2

The research and practice of test-based judgments in standard setting on medical examination
原文传递
导出
摘要 考试合格标准的设定有许多种方法。在医学统一考试中,采用了基于考试内容的对错判断法和区间判断法。为了评价两种方法合格标准设定的差异,本文分析了我国医学统一考试中合格标准设定的结果,总结了基于考试内容的专家判断法应用于实践中的认识,提出了今后的研究方向。 There are many methods to setting standards on examination. The test-based judgment methods : "yes/no" method, interval method have been used for setting cut score on national medical examination. In order to investigate the effect of the two methods, we analyzed and evaluated the result, summarized our experiences in using test-based judgment methods on standard setting for national medical examination, and proposed future work.
出处 《中华医学教育杂志》 2012年第6期943-945,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medical Education
关键词 医学统一考试 合格标准设定 专家判断 实践 探索 National medical examination Standard setting Judges Practice Exploration
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Hambleton R. K, Pitoniak M.J. Setting Performance Standards// Robert L. B. ed. Educational Measurement. 4 ed. Westport, CT : ACE/Praeger, 2006.
  • 2Reckase, M.D., Bay, L. Analysis of methods for collecting test- based judgements. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education ,San Diego, 1998.
  • 3Angoff, W. H. Scales, norms, and equivalent scores//Thorndike R.L. ed. Educational Measurement. Washington, DC : American Council on Education, 1971.
  • 4Livingston S. A. ,Zieky M.J. Passing scores: A manual for setting standards of performance on educational and occupational tests. Princeton, NJ : Educational Testing Service, 1982.
  • 5何惧,何佳,安滔,高靖.Angoff法及其衍生方法在资格考试合格线设定中的比较研究[J].中国考试,2007(6):23-26. 被引量:10
  • 6何佳,何惧,于惊涛,高靖.语言考试中标准设置过程的评价分析[J].中国考试,2007(2):34-37. 被引量:3

二级参考文献3

  • 1赵世明.确定行业资格考试的合格标准[J].中国考试.2003(Z4)
  • 2American Educational Research Association (AERA).American Psychological Association (APA), and National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME)[].Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.1999
  • 3Cizek,G.J,Bunch, M.B.,and Koons, H.Setting performance standards: contemporary methods[].Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice.2004

共引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部