期刊文献+

曲马多与芬太尼分别联合丙泊酚用于经皮微波消融治疗肝癌的麻醉效果比较 被引量:7

Anesthetic Effect of Propofol Combined with Tramadol or Fentanyl in Ultrasonically Guided Percutaneous Microwave Coagulation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较曲马多与芬太尼分别联合丙泊酚用于超声引导下经皮微波消融疗法(percutaneous microwave coagulationtherapy,PMCT)治疗肝癌的麻醉效果。方法:选取择期行PMCT的肝癌患者50例,ASA分级Ⅰ~Ⅱ级,年龄41~67岁,将其随机均分为两组。两组患者均采用靶控输注(target-controlled infusion,TCI)丙泊酚镇静,并以脑电双频指数(BIS)值50±10调节TCI效应室浓度。曲马多组(T组):TCI丙泊酚前缓慢静脉推注1mg/kg曲马多;芬太尼组(F组):TCI丙泊酚前缓慢静脉推注1μg/kg芬太尼。记录两组患者在麻醉诱导前、诱导后和经皮穿刺后3、5、10min的平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)和血氧饱和度(SpO2)以及其治疗时间、苏醒时间和并发症发生情况。结果:两组患者的治疗时间、苏醒时间和呕吐发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。F组HR在诱导后和穿刺后3min时显著低于T组(P<0.05);F组SpO2在穿刺后3min和穿刺后5min显著低于T组(P<0.05);F组MAP在诱导后和穿刺后3min显著低于T组(P<0.05);F组心动过缓、低血压及低氧血症的发生率高于T组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:曲马多与芬太尼分别联合丙泊酚输注用于PMCT治疗肝癌手术,均能达到满意的麻醉效果,但曲马多对患者的呼吸循环影响更小。 Objective:To compare the anesthetic effect of propofol combined with tramadol or fentanyl in ultrasonically guided percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy(PMCT)for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).Methods:Fifty patients with HCC(ASAⅠ-Ⅱ)aged 41-67 years,undergoing ultrasonically guided PMCT were allocated randomly to two groups with 25 patients in each group.Anesthesia was administered with propofol given by target-controlled infusion(TCI)for both groups,and bispectral index(BIS)value was maintained at 50±10 by adjustment of effect-site concentration of propofol.The patients received slowly intravenous 1 mg/kg tramadol(Group T) or 1 μg/kg fentanyl(Group F)before propofol infusion.Heart rate(HR),mean arterial pressure(MAP) and oxygen saturation(SpO2)were recorded at baseline,induction,after puncture 3 min,5 min and 10 min.PMCT duration,recovery time and adverse effects were also recorded.Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in vomiting incidence,therapeutic time and recovery time(P0.05).HR in Group F decreased more than that in Group T after induction and after puncture 3 min(P0.05).SpO2 in Group F decreased more than that in Group T after puncture 3 min and 5 min(P0.05).MAP in Group F decreased more than that in Group T after induction and after puncture 3 min(P0.05).The incidences of bradycardia,hypotension and hypoxemia in Group F were higher than those in Group T(P0.05).Conclusions: Propofol combined with tramadol or fentanyl can provide satisfactory anesthesia for the operation of HCC with ultrasonically guided PMCT,but tramadol maintains better hemodynamic and respiratory stability.
出处 《中国临床医学》 2013年第1期72-74,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Medicine
关键词 曲马多 芬太尼 丙泊酚 经皮微波消融 肝癌 Tramadol Fentanyl Propofol Percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Chen HW, Lai EC, Zhen ZJ,et al. Ultrasound-guided percu taneous cryotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma [ J]. Int J Surg,2011,9(2) ..188-191.
  • 2祝祎,张宏,梁萍,于晓玲.七氟醚吸入麻醉与丙泊酚静脉麻醉在超声引导下经皮微波消融治疗肝癌中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(4):291-293. 被引量:15
  • 3Steward DJ. A simplified scoring system for the post-operativerecovery room[J], Can Anaesth Soc J, 1975 ,22( 1) : 111-113.
  • 4Pollard BJ,Elliott RA,Moore EW. Anaesthetic agents in adultday case surgery[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol,2003,20( 1) : 1-9.
  • 5VanNatta ME,Rex DK. Propofol alone titrated to deep seda-tion versus propofol in combination with opioids and/orbenzodiazepines and titrated to moderate sedation for colonos-copy[J]. Am J Gastroenterol,2006,101(10) :2209-2217.
  • 6Ali S,Davidson DL,Gremse DA. Comparison of fentanyl ver-sus meperidine for analgesia in pediatric gastrointestinal en-doscopy[J]. Dig Dis Sci,2004,49(5) : 881-891.
  • 7Phillips AS,McMurray TJ,Mirakhur RK,et al. Propofol-fent-anyl anaesthesia in cardiac surgery: a comparison in patientswith good and impaired ventricular function[J]. Anaesthesia.1993,48(8):661-663.
  • 8Scott LJ,Perry CM. Tramadol:a review of its use in perioper-ative pain[J]. Drugs,2000,60(1) : 139-176.
  • 9Nimmaanrat S,Wasinwong W,Uakritdathikarn T,et al. Theanalgesic efficacy of tramadol in ambulatory gynecological lap-aroscopic procedures: a randomized controlled study[J]. Mi-nerva Anestesiol,2007,73(12) : 623-628.
  • 10Kim SI, Han TH,Kil HY, et al. Prevention of postoperativenausea and vomiting by continuous infusion of subhypnoticpropofol in female patients receiving intravenous patient-con-trolled analgesia[J]. Br J Anaesth,2000,85(6) :898-900.

二级参考文献8

  • 1Knaggs CL,Drummond GB.Randomized comparison of three methods of induction of anaesthesia with sevoflurane.Br J Anaesth,2005,95:178-182.
  • 2Pollard BJ,Elliott RA,Moore EW.Anaesthetic agents in adult day case surgery.Eur J Anaesthesiol,2003,20:1-9.
  • 3Ghatge S,Lee J,Smith I.Sevoflurane:an ideal agent for adult day-case anesthesia? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2003,47:917-931.
  • 4Kati I,Demirel CB,Huseyinoglu UA,et al.Comparison of propofol and sevoflurane for laryngeal mask airway insertion.Tohoku J Exp Med,2003,200:111-118.
  • 5Gupta A,Stierer T,Zuckerman R,et al.Comparison of recovery profile after ambluatory anesthesia with propofol,isoflurane,sevoflurane and desflurane:a systematic review.Anesth Analg,2004,98:632-641.
  • 6Sneyd JR,Andrews CJ,Tsubokawa T.Comparison of propofol/remifentanil and sevoflurane/remifentanil for maintenance of anaesthesia for elective intracranial surgery.Br J Anaesth,2005,94:778-783.
  • 7Hofer CK,Zollinger A,Buchi S,et al.Patient well-being after general anaesthesia:a prospective,randomized,controlled multicentre trial comparing intravenous and inhalation anaesthesia.Br J Anaesth,2003,91:631-637.
  • 8Moore JK,Moore EW,Elliott RA,et al.Propofol and halothane versus sevoflurane in paediatric day-case surgery:induction and recovery characteristics.Br J Anaesth,2003,90:461-466.

共引文献14

同被引文献46

引证文献7

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部