期刊文献+

慢性心衰中西医结合生存质量量表与SF-36量表的效度对比研究 被引量:15

Validities of Chronic Heart Failure Quality of Life Scale of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine and SF-36 Scale:A Comparative Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的以简明健康状况量表(以下简称SF-36量表)为标准参照,评价慢性心衰中西医结合生存质量量表的效度。方法采用横断面调查方法,在北京市5家医院内纳入63名慢性心力衰竭住院患者,在患者知情同意基础上采用慢性心衰中西医结合生存质量量表、SF-36量表调查其生存质量,对慢性心衰中西医结合生存质量量表的效度进行评价。结果相关系数法、逐步回归分析证实慢性心衰中西医结合生存质量量表具有较好的内容效度,因子分析显示其具有良好的结构效度,以SF-36量表作为标准参照显示其具有良好的标准效度(r=0.79,P<0.01)。结论慢性心衰中西医结合生存质量量表具有较好的效度,可以作为心衰中西医结合生存质量的评价工具。 Objective To evaluate the validity of Chronic Heart Failure Quality of Life Scale of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine (CRF-QOL-ICWM) using the 3f-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) scale as a reference. Methods A cross sectional survey was conducted in 63 inpatients with chronic heart failure selected from 5 hospitals in Beijing, China. The CRF-QOL-ICWM and SF-36 scale were used to in- vestigate the quality of life (QOL) in patients who provided informed consent. The validity of CRF-QOI.- ICWM was evaluated. Results The correlation coefficient method and stepwise regression analysis demon- strated that CRF-QOL-ICWM had good content validity; the factor analysis showed that this scale had good construct validity; also, it had good criterion validity, as compared to the SF-36 scale as a reference (r=0.79, P〈0.01). Conclusion CRF-QOL-ICWM has good validity and can be used as a tool of inte grated Chinese and Western medicine for evaluating the QOL in patients with chronic heart failure.
出处 《安徽中医学院学报》 CAS 2013年第2期30-34,共5页 Journal of Anhui Traditional Chinese Medical College
基金 北京中医药大学自主选题资助项目(2011JYB22JS-035)
关键词 慢性心力衰竭 生存质量 SF-36量表 慢性心衰中西医结合生存质量量表 quality of life chronic heart failure SF-36 scale chronic heart failure quality of life scale ofintegrated Chinese and western medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献44

  • 1彭爱芝.生活质量——一种新型的健康评价方法[J].天津护理,2005,13(3):182-183. 被引量:20
  • 2孙伯青.益气活血法治疗充血性心力衰竭的临床研究[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志,2006,13(1):44-47. 被引量:47
  • 3秦浩,陈景武.医学量表条目的筛选考评方法及其应用[J].中国行为医学科学,2006,15(4):375-376. 被引量:169
  • 4刘加林,钟涛,梁传余,王力红,刘世喜.生存质量量表选择的策略[J].四川医学,2006,27(7):675-676. 被引量:13
  • 5SFDA.中药新药临床研究指导原则.北京:中国医药科技出版社.2002:390-391.
  • 6Ware JE, Shebourne CD. The MOS 36-item shortform health survey (SF-36) : 1. Conceptual framework and item selection[J]. Med Care, 1992,30(6) : 473 - 483.
  • 7Sidorov J, Shull RD, Girolami S, et al. Use of the short form 36 in a primary care based disease management program for patient program for patients with congestive heart failure[J]. Dis Manag, 2003,6 (2) : 111 - 117.
  • 8Hobbs F D,Kenkre J E,Roalfe A K,et al.Impact of heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction on quality of life.Eur Heart J,2002,23(23):1867-1876.
  • 9Mc Homey CA, Ware J, Raczek AE.The MOS 36-item ShortForm Health Survey (SF-36):Ⅱ Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs[J].Med Care,1993,31 (3):247-263.
  • 10Jenkinson C, Jenkinson D, Shepperd S,et al.Evaluation of treatment for congestive heart failure in patients aged 60 years and older using generic measures of health status(SF-36 and COOP charts)[J].Age Ageing,1997.26(l):7-13.

共引文献236

同被引文献177

引证文献15

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部