庄子的“真人”与尼采的“超人”内涵和价值之比较

Comparison of Connotation and Value between Chuang Tzu's "Taoist Holy Man" and Nietzsche's "Superman"

庄子与尼采作为一东一西、一古一今的哲人,二者均在理想人格建构方面即分别提出"真人"与"超人"之说,该文就二者的理想人格理论——"真人"与"超人"在其内涵及意义方面进行同中存异的比较分析,旨在吸取各自的理论精华。诚然比较庄子的"真人"与尼采的"超人"并非是笔者在这里探究的主旨,比照和探析两者的价值在于发见两位思想家的观点究竟能为当今的时代人格的塑造与建构带来多大的启迪、支持和帮助。

As the philosopher,Chuang Tzu and Nietzsche both proposed ＂Taoist holy man＂ and ＂Superman＂ in the construction of ideal personality.This article carried on the comparative analysis on both ideal personality theory-＂Taoist holy man＂ and ＂Superman＂ in its connotation and significance with regard to differences to learn the essence of their theory.The true value of comparison between Chuang Tzu＇s ＂Taoist holy man＂ and Nietzsche＇s ＂Superman＂ is two viewpoints can bring great inspiration,support and help for the construction of era personality.