期刊文献+

发散思维的神经认知模型及其本土化运用探索

The Neurocognitive Model of Divergent Thinking and Its Localized Application
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究验证了Brandoni和Anderson设计的发散思维神经认知评估模型的理论基础、应用意义及在中国本土施行的可能性。模型产生于神经认知科学领域的理论与研究发现,具有跨领域研究、应用的意义。在对模型本土运用进行验证时,选取了30名上海本地中学平行班七年级学生为样本,最终得到10个编码值(D、C、D、C、H、S、NS、CU、DS、R)得分,通过计算其变异系数并呈现各类别上的四分区间频数分布,得出结论:模型在评估本土样本发散思维上同样能够敏感地捕捉到个体差异。 The present research has verified a new model established by Brandoni and Anderson for assessing divergent thinking, discussing and evaluating its underlying theoretical mechanism, significance and feasibility of pratical application in local China. 30 students from middle school in Shanghai were chose as the subjects. Through interview and two-part coding process, the scores of the sample on 10 scale values ( D, C, D : C, H, S, NS, CU, DS, R) were acquired. By calculating these 10 values' coefficient of variation and delineating their distribution within quar- tile scores, the present study eventually came to the conclusion that such model are sufficient to capture the individ- ual difference.
作者 陈天齐
出处 《江苏经贸职业技术学院学报》 2013年第1期54-59,共6页 Journal of Jiangsu Institute of Commerce
基金 上海市教委科研创新重点项目"教育神经科学的前沿研究与课堂教学的创新"(11ZS46)
关键词 发散思维 神经认知科学 教育学 本土 divergent thinking neurocognitive model education local context
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Jauk E, Benedek M, Neubauer A C. Tackling Creativity at its Roots : Evidence for Different Patterns of EEG Alpha Ac- tivity Related to Convergent and Divergent Modes of Task Processing [ J ]. International Journal of Psychology, 2012, (84) :219 - 225.
  • 2Moore D W, Bhadelia R A, Billings R L, Fulwiler C, Hei- lman K M, Rood K M J, Gansler D A. Hemispheric Con- nectivity and the Visual-spatial Divergent-thinking Compo- nent of Creativity [ J ]. Brain and Cognition, 2009, ( 70 ) : 267 - 272.
  • 3Eysenck H. Creativity, Personality and the Convergent-diver- gent Continuum[ M]. NJ : Hampton Press,2003:95 - 114.
  • 4Brandoni C, Anderson O R. A New Neurocognitive Model for Assessing Divergent Thinking: Applicability, Evidence of Reliability, and Implications for Educational Theory and Practice [ J ]. Creativity Research Journal, 2009, 21 ( 4 ) : 326 - 337.
  • 5Razoumnikova O M. Functional Organization of Different Brain Areas during Convergent and Divergent Thinking: an EEG Investigation [ J ]. Cognitive Brain Research, 2000, (10) :11 -18.
  • 6Klopfer, L. E. Research and The Crisis in Science Education [J]. Science Education, 1983,67(3) :283 -284.
  • 7Gil-Perez D, Guisasola J, Moreno A, Cachapuz A, Pessoa DE Carvalho A M, Torregrosa J M, Salinas J, Vald S P, Gonz Lez E, Duch A G, Dumas-Carr A, Tric Rico H, Gal- lego R. Defending Constructivism in Science Education [ J l- Science and Education,2002, ( 11 ) :557 - 571.
  • 8Applefield J M, Huber R, Moallem M. Constructivism in Theory and Practice: Toward a Better Understanding [ J ]. The High School Journal 2001,84(2) :35 -53.
  • 9Driscoll M P. Psychology of Learning for Instruction [ M ] UMich : Allyn and Bacon, 1994:373 - 384.
  • 10Anderson 0 R. A Neurocognitive Perspective on Current Learning Theory and Science Instructional Strategies [ J ]. Science Education, 1997,81 ( 1 ) :67 - 89.

二级参考文献42

共引文献269

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部