期刊文献+

高校扩招使得个体就业状况更糟糕吗? 被引量:15

Graduates' Employment Become Worse after Educational Expansion?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于高校扩招前后大学生群体的比较,人们普遍认为扩招后大学生的就业状况变差了。我们在认同这一观点的基础上,着重考察了另外一个问题:在教育扩张的背景下,如果个体读大学与假设他不读大学相比,就业状况会如何?利用扩招前后两个年份的全国性人口调查数据,采用描述性统计和基于倾向分匹配估计的方法对此进行了分析。主要结论是:高校扩招后大学毕业生相对于高中毕业生在就业上仍旧延续了优势地位,并且没有明显的变化,现实中观察到的扩招后大学生失业率的上升更多的是由于个体能力和家庭背景等因素造成的,高校扩招在其中仅起到微弱的作用。其政策含义是,就业政策应更加关注低学历人群的就业和就业保障,我国初中后教育规模的进一步扩张仍具有现实基础。 Comparing the employment statuses of graduates before and after the educational expansion, most people think that the graduates'employment in China has became worse after the expansion. However, that argument ignores the following issue:If those graduates did not enroll in college,then what their employment status would be? In this paper,I use the meth- ods of descriptive analysis and propensity score matching estimator to answer the above point according to two nationwide population survey data sets. The results indicate that the relative dominant position of university graduates to high school graduates in employment does not change by higher education expansion. The reality of unemployment rate increasing of the highly educated after expansion has resulted more from individual's ability and household background. It suggests that em- ployment policy should pay more attention to the lower educated;in fact, further expansion of post-secondary school is still demanded.
作者 孙志军
出处 《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期108-115,共8页 Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目"实施扩大就业的发展战略研究"(07&ZD044) 北京师范大学"中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助"
关键词 高校扩招 大学毕业生 高中毕业生 就业 匹配估计 higher education expansion university graduates high school graduates employment matching estimates
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献88

  • 1叶南客.南京市民对职业声望的评价[J].社会,1997,17(1):8-8. 被引量:13
  • 2折晓叶,陈婴婴.中国农村“职业—身分”声望研究[J].中国社会科学,1995(6):83-95. 被引量:26
  • 3蔡禾,赵钊卿.社会分层研究:职业声望评价与职业价值[J].管理世界,1995,11(4):191-196. 被引量:38
  • 4吴邦国.2002:《以“三个代表”重要思想为指导切实做好下岗失业人员再就业工作》,载于《中国积极的就业政策--全国再就业工作会议(2002)文件汇编》,中国劳动和社会保障出版社.
  • 5Angrist Joshua D. 2004, "Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Theory and Practice", Economic Journal, 114, C52--83.
  • 6Bertrand Marianne, Esther Duflo and Sendhil Mullainathan, 2004, "How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?" Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119 (February) : 249--276.
  • 7Borjas G., 2006, Labor Economics, McGraw-Hill International Edition.
  • 8Donald, Stephen G. and Kevin Lang, 2007, "Inference with Difference-ln-Differences and Other Panel Data", Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 89 (2): 221--233.
  • 9Duflo Esther, 2001, "Schooling and Labor Market Consequences of School Construction in Indonesia: Evidence from an Unusual Policy Experiment", American Economic Review, Vol. 91, No. 4. pp. 795--813.
  • 10Meyer Bruce, 1995, "Natural and Quasi-Experiments in Economics", Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 151-- 161.

共引文献1373

同被引文献201

引证文献15

二级引证文献117

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部